Answer:
Slave laws in the southern colonies in the 1600s "b. defined an enslaved person as someone who could be bought and sold" This rule was set in place to fight against some owners who attempted to set their slaves free prematurely.
Explanation:
Slave laws in the southern colonies in the 1600s defined an enslaved person as someone who could be bought and sold.
Southern laws in America were so harsh on slaves. Let's have in mind that the southern economy depended so much on slaves. That is why southern people were against abolitionism. Slaves had to work long hours in the large southern plantations to produce the kind of crops needed for trade and to export to Europe. Slaves in the south lived difficult lives and were not considered to be persons, but property.
Answer:
the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Explanation: In 1922, Russia along with countries under its control formed the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (the USSR) better known as the Soviet Union (or the Soviets). It was a communist group and did not agree with western, capitalist countries or their way of ruling.
Answer: Vladimir Putin
Answer:
Investigation
Arrest
Trial
Jury deliberation
Verdict
Sentencing
Indictment
Appeal
Explanation:
I believe this is right but let me know if I'm wrong.
People won’t know how to express there feelings on something like homework for example because they’ve been at home for a year and have been talking to a computer this whole time. They haven’t had any human interactions, especially the little kids who are in elementary and just started school.
Hope this helps!
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following?
When the influence of the situation is _______, the consequent behavior is more likely to be a result of _______.
Select one:
a. weak; individual personalities
b. weak; external circumstances
c. strong; internal forces
d. strong; dispositions
Answer:
The correct option is letter A. When the influence of the situation is weak, the consequent behavior is more likely to be a result of individual personalities.
Explanation:
Since behavior is a product of a situation combined with the person, it is fair to think that the result may be accounted for differently according to how strong each element is. Thus, if a situation and the "sub-elements" it includes - such as the presence of others, cultural and social influences, and so on - are weak, it is only logic to assume that the element "person" will be predominant. The result behavior is, therefore, more likely to be a consequence of that individual's personality.
