Answer:
here give kittylover22 the brain tho also I am him just give kittylover not this one
Explanation:
A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is <u>B. The </u><u>Chesapeake </u><u>and </u><u>New England colonies </u><u>developed into</u><u> two distinct societies </u><u>based on their </u><u>geography</u><u>, </u><u>reasons </u><u>for </u><u>founding</u><u>, </u><u>economic </u><u>characteristics, and </u><u>relationships </u><u>with </u><u>American Indians.</u>
You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.
The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:
- New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
- New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.
Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.
We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.</em>
1. took too much space
2. no stores
3. steel
The Annapolis meeting created the <em>need for the Philadelphia Convention</em>. The delegates of a few states gathered to address the topic of trade among the states, which, at the same time, led to other important topics of the Confederation. This way, they considered a Constitution would have to be drafted in order to address many other relevant topics of the country, aside from commercial trade. The <em>United States Constitution was drafted at the Philadelphia Convention</em> in 1787.
Because such people have their mind sets that they can never be wrong.
Explanation:
Infallibility is something when a person doesn't feel himself wrong. This happens when people have their minds set that they are always right and the other person engaged in the argument with them is wrong, and there is nothing wrong with them. It is actually the inability of themselves to sense their selves wrong.
No one can be infallible. Every human is fallible. So one considering himself fallible is totally wrong. It might happen sometimes that people are right in an argument, but it does not matter that they would always be right. They can be gone wrong sometimes.
It is heard and seen in our daily lives that in an argument with a person who thinks himself infallible, the other person usually says that it is better to keep quiet now, as i know you are never going to consider yourself at mistake.
So it is totally a wrong practice.
Learn more about some concept and example of infallibility at:
brainly.com/question/9196130
#LearnWithBrainly