He participated in a public protest. The first one never happened and the last option is far-fetched as Martin wasn't a criminal, he simply stated opinions. he was taken into custody with many other marchers during the protest.
1. shining with all its might
2. she thinks the night belongs to her and her alone
Answer:
The best statement which describe Javier's research question is:
O. It is specific but not too narrow, and is phrased to allow for an in-depth response.
Explanation:
From the question which was asked by Javier, we could see that, he asked a specific question in his question to obtain the positive or negative effect og life in Japan as a result of Treaty of San Francisco.
On the other-hand, it is not too narrow due to the fact that, the effect could range from education, to history or from military hardware to medical researches. <em>It is phrased to allow for in-depth response which would take up all the time in the history class while not providing opportunities for all students to contribute within the allocated time frame. </em>
Answer:
A government curfew would prevent fights and arguments between parents and children on the topic of curfews. In a survey of 100 parents, 90 percent agreed with the idea that discussing curfews is stressful for parents and children. Plus, 60 percent said that enforcing a curfew was very difficult because children mostly reacted negatively. Finally, 75 percent of the parents felt that constant arguments on the topic caused everyone at home to be upset. Getting teenagers to stick to a curfew is no easy task because they, understandably, don’t like curfews. In many homes, curfews cannot be discussed without the slamming of doors or the smashing of a dish or two. But if a citywide curfew became the law, children would understand the seriousness of it. And parents would have an easier time convincing their kids to obey the rule. The fear of getting questioned by the police would further motivate children to obey the law. Additionally, a government curfew would force neglectful parents to keep tabs on the whereabouts of their children at night.
Explanation:
A government curfew would prevent fights and arguments between parents and children on the topic of curfews. In a survey of 100 parents, 90 percent agreed with the idea that discussing curfews is stressful for parents and children. Plus, 60 percent said that enforcing a curfew was very difficult because children mostly reacted negatively. Finally, 75 percent of the parents felt that constant arguments on the topic caused everyone at home to be upset. Getting teenagers to stick to a curfew is no easy task because they, understandably, don’t like curfews. In many homes, curfews cannot be discussed without the slamming of doors or the smashing of a dish or two. But if a c
itywide curfew became the law, children would understand the seriousness of it. And parents would have an easier time convincing their kids to obey the rule. The fear of getting questioned by the police would further motivate children to obey the law. Additionally, a government curfew would force neglectful parents to keep tabs on the whereabouts of their children at night.
