The answer is B for question #1
Answer:
5x
Explanation:
cuz i said sooo and its lite work
EXAMPLE: you dont know wut x is so u but 5x that simple
Answer:
Wilson and his policy's had changed history, and defined the 20th century, a lot more than john f Kennedy or Reagan. with his new form of imperialism called Wilsonian interventionism, which the us continues, he segregated the federal government and even fostered the second KKK through his historian credentials. he expanded the executive branches powers to large proportions, and soured several diplomatic relations. Wilson had been sympathetic to the confederates. when Wilson was young he had lost cause revisionism when it came to the civil war. as he grew he believed the USA was the shining city on the hill. Wilson was a very religious person, he was very strict on his opinion, even on the smallest things he would fight tooth and nail on his opinion. Wilson didn't have a good grasp on how the world actually worked. during world war one he had tried to smother any flame for the USA to join the great war.
Sam Houston was also the President of the Republic of Texas. He was elected twice (1936 & 1841) as the President of the the Republic of Texas. He was very instrumental in the defeat of the Mexicans, which resulted in the independence of Texas. When Texas joined the Union he became a Senator.
Answer:
3. A Roman consul was the highest elected political office of the Roman Republic . Each year, two consuls were elected together, to serve for a one-year term. Each consul was given veto power over his colleague and the officials would alternate each month. The Roman Senate was a political institution in ancient Rome. It was one of the most enduring institutions in Roman history, being established in the first days of the city of Rome, traditionally founded in 753 BC.
4. One of the differences between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire that followed it was the former republic's inability to manage the huge amount of territory that it had acquired. The Roman Empire, however, was able to control Rome's holdings, and remained more effective at stifling civil unrest. By removing the system of checks and balances that was in place during the republic, the Roman Empire's incumbent emperor was able to respond quickly and with greater force to any perceived or unfolding threat.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
