Answer:
False
Explanation:
The case stated in question statement does not refer to focused differentiation strategy rather it is an example of Focused cost leadership strategy.
Focused cost leadership strategy is one that is competes on price margins targeting a narrow market and setting the price lower than other already existing competitors.
While, on the other end a focused differentiation strategy targets acquiring market by introducing some different product.
Answer:
The correct answer is 4.05%.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Spot rate = $1.73
Expected spot rate after 1 year = $1.66
So, we can calculate the depreciation percentage by using the following formula:
Expected Depreciation = (Expected spot rate after 1 year - Spot rate) / Spot rate
So, by putting the value
= ($1.66 – $1.73) / $1.73
= - $0.07 / $1.73
= - 4.05%
Hence, the depreciation percentage is 4.05%.
Answer:
B. The South Carolina cases will be dismissed on the grounds of forum non conveniens
Explanation:
The following choices are:
A. whiny, moping
<span>B. outgoing, witty, and sociable </span>
<span>C. complex, intelligent, and deeply sensitive </span>
<span>D. businesslike and straightforward
</span>
The correct answer is letter B. outgoing, witty and sociable. Mercutio himself likes the Romeo who is Romeo compared for the ones that is pined Rosaline.
<span> </span>
Answer:
$24,160 favorable
Explanation:
The computation of the total contribution margin sales volume variance is given below:
The Budgeted contribution margin per pound of MT is
= $40 - $20
= $20 per pound
Now the budgeted contribution margin per pound of ET is
= $60 - $30
= $24 per pound
MT's contribution margin sales volume variance is
= (Actual sales quantity - Budgeted sales quantity) × Budgeted contribution margin per pound
= (3960 - 4000) × $20
= $800 Unfavorable
ET's contribution margin sales volume variance is
= (Actual sales quantity - Budgeted sales quantity) × Budgeted contribution margin per pound
= (5,040 - 4000) × $24
= $24,960 favorable
Now the total contribution margin sales volume is
= $800 unfavorable + $24,960 favorable
= $24,160 favorable