Answer: Yes
Explanation:
The construction company is entitled to compensation because it has a property right to enter and remove minerals.
The investor gave the construction company the right to use the properties on the land, if anything would be done on the land, the construction company should be compensated because they bought the right to do business there. Since the owner granted them the sole right, they are entitled to the resources.
Answer:
This situation is an example of cross Price elasticity of Demand
Explanation:
If change in Price in Rental Company A doesn't necessitate change in prices in Rental companies B.C.D.E & F
Then the products A has on offer are not close substitutes to the rival companies
However where Rental company G lowers his price and it immediately triggers a Price reduction in Companies B to F, then obviously they offer similar products that are close substitutes and serve similar segment or channel of the Market Size. Thus failure to lower their Price will automatically see Customers rent cars more from Company G.
This situation is an example of cross Price elasticity of Demand
Answer:
The electrical action has the better expected monetary value with 492,000
Explanation:
We will multiply the expected outcome by their probability then, we add them to get the expected monetary value per option:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}$WIND-UP&$Return&$Probability&$Weight\\$Light&325000&0.1&32500\\$Morerate&190000&0.3&57000\\$Heavy&170000&0.6&102000\\$Total&&1&191500\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccccc%7D%24WIND-UP%26%24Return%26%24Probability%26%24Weight%5C%5C%24Light%26325000%260.1%2632500%5C%5C%24Morerate%26190000%260.3%2657000%5C%5C%24Heavy%26170000%260.6%26102000%5C%5C%24Total%26%261%26191500%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}$PNEUMATIC&Return&Probability&Weight\\$Light&300000&0.1&30000\\$Morerate&420000&0.3&126000\\$Heavy&400000&0.6&240000\\$Total&&1&396000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%24PNEUMATIC%26Return%26Probability%26Weight%5C%5C%24Light%26300000%260.1%2630000%5C%5C%24Morerate%26420000%260.3%26126000%5C%5C%24Heavy%26400000%260.6%26240000%5C%5C%24Total%26%261%26396000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}$Electrical&Return&Probability&Weight\\$Light&-600000&0.1&-60000\\$Morerate&240000&0.3&72000\\$Heavy&800000&0.6&480000\\$Total&&1&492000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%24Electrical%26Return%26Probability%26Weight%5C%5C%24Light%26-600000%260.1%26-60000%5C%5C%24Morerate%26240000%260.3%2672000%5C%5C%24Heavy%26800000%260.6%26480000%5C%5C%24Total%26%261%26492000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. Prepare a CVP income statement that shows both total and per unit amounts.
CVP INCOME STATEMENT
Per unit. Total
Sales (500 units). 400. 200,000
Variable expense 280 140,000
Contribution margin. 120 60,000
Fixed expense. 48,000
Net operating Income. 12,000
b. Compute Norton's breakeven in units.
Breakeven point = 48000 / 120 = 400
c. Prepare a CVP income statement for the break-even point that shows both total and per unit amounts.
CVP income statement for the break-even point
Per unit. Total
Sales (400 units). 400. 160,000
Variable expense 280 112,000
Contribution margin. 120 48000
Fixed expense. 48,000
Net operating Income. 0
According to the historical cost principle, if an asset costs $50,000 when it was purchased, and the one who purchased it still owns the asset today, it will have a higher value than $50,000. If the interest rate is assumed to be 5% for 5 years, the asset will be recorded as $63,814.08.
