1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ASHA 777 [7]
3 years ago
6

9. What was significant about the roads described here? (1 point)

History
2 answers:
Marina CMI [18]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

They allowed armies and news to move rapidly throughout the empire.

Explanation:

tamaranim1 [39]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

They allowed armies and news to move rapidly throughout the empire.

Explanation:

The roads described are the roads of the Roman Empire, so that rules out the other options that we have, because Tenochtitlán was the capital of the Aztec Empire, and then the Inca wasn´t the first civilization to construct them, the roads in the Roman empire helped and allowed armies to move rapidly throught the entire empire as well as news to move along them.

You might be interested in
What was the purpose of the policy of non-alignment
Dennis_Churaev [7]
The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) was created and founded during the collapse of the colonial system and the independence struggles of the peoples of Africa, Asia, Latin America and other regions of the world and at the height of the Cold War. During the early days of the Movement, its actions were a key factor in the decolonization process, which led later to the attainment of freedom and independence by many countries and peoples and to the founding of tens of new sovereign States. Throughout its history, the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries has played a fundamental role in the preservation of world peace and security.

While some meetings with a third-world perspective were held before 1955, historians consider that the Bandung Asian-African Conference is the most immediate antecedent to the creation of the Non-Aligned Movement. This Conference was held in Bandung on April 18-24, 1955 and gathered 29 Heads of States belonging to the first post-colonial generation of leaders from the two continents with the aim of identifying and assessing world issues at the time and pursuing out joint policies in international relations.

The principles that would govern relations among large and small nations, known as the "Ten Principles of Bandung", were proclaimed at that Conference. Such principles were adopted later as the main goals and objectives of the policy of non-alignment. The fulfillment of those principles became the essential criterion for Non-Aligned Movement membership; it is what was known as the "quintessence of the Movement" until the early 1990s.

In 1960, in the light of the results achieved in Bandung, the creation of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries was given a decisive boost during the Fifteenth Ordinary Session of the United Nations General Assembly, during which 17 new African and Asian countries were admitted. A key role was played in this process by the then Heads of State and Government Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt, Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Shri Jawaharlal Nehru of India, Ahmed Sukarno of Indonesia and Josip Broz Tito of Yugoslavia, who later became the founding fathers of the movement and its emblematic leaders.

Six years after Bandung, the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries was founded on a wider geographical basis at the First Summit Conference of Belgrade, which was held on September 1-6, 1961. The Conference was attended by 25 countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Yemen, Myanmar, Cambodia, Srilanka, Congo, Cuba, Cyprus, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Lebanon, Mali, Morocco, Nepal, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Yugoslavia.

The Founders of NAM have preferred to declare it as a movement but not an organization in order to avoid bureaucratic implications of the latter.

The membership criteria formulated during the Preparatory Conference to the Belgrade Summit (Cairo, 1961) show that the Movement was not conceived to play a passive role in international politics but to formulate its own positions in an independent manner so as to reflect the interests of its members.

Thus, the primary of objectives of the non-aligned countries focused on the support of self-determination, national independence and the sovereignty and territorial integrity of States; opposition to apartheid; non-adherence to multilateral military pacts and the independence of non-aligned countries from great power or block influences and rivalries; the struggle against imperialism in all its forms and manifestations; the struggle against colonialism, neocolonialism, racism, foreign occupation and domination; disarmament; non-interference into the internal affairs of States and peaceful coexistence among all nations; rejection of the use or threat of use of force in international relations; the strengthening of the United Nations; the democratization of international relations; socioeconomic development and the restructuring of the international economic system; as well as international cooperation on an equal footing.

Since its inception, the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries has waged a ceaseless battle to ensure that peoples being oppressed by foreign occupation and domination can exercise their inalienable right to self-determination and independence.

During the 1970s and 1980s, the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries played a key role in the struggle for the establishment of a new international economic order that allowed all the peoples of the world to make use of their wealth and natural resources and provided a wide platform for a fundamental change in international economic relations and the economic emancipation of the countries of the
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the major difference between the Magna Carta and the code of Hammurabi
anzhelika [568]
<span> The major difference between the two is the degree of democracy that they contemplate. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did fedulism hindered germany
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
Hey there,

Answer:

From what I know, it was a jumbled mess. 

Hope this helps :D

<em>~Top</em>
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In June 1876, under orders from the US government to force the Native Americans onto reservations, federal troops entered the Li
algol13

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

We are talking about the Battle of Little Bighorn.

It is correct that in this battle of June 1876, under orders from the US government to force the Native Americans onto reservations, federal troops entered the Little Bighorn Valley in Montana Territory. Although the troops were outnumbered, they attacked anyway.

The battle was a mistake and resulted in the defeat of the US Army.

The Battle of Little Bighorn resulted in a major defeat of the Calvary of the United States. The Arapaho Tribes, the Lakota, and the Cheyenne fight the 7th Cavalry Regiment led by Colonel George Custer. The Native American Indians had a superior number of men and they practically destroyed the US soldiers and Colonel Custer was killed on the battlefield.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did Poland and France fall to the Germans so quickly?​
zepelin [54]

Explanation:

The Polish knew they were going to lose, But they wanted to stall the Germans enough so the French and the British can move through the Rhineland. But when the war started, the French and British didn't attack. The Polish kept telling the French commanders to move in, but they denied to stay in their defenses in the Maginot line. After the annexation of Poland, The Germans switched their priorities to the west. The German Armor played a big role in the Battle Of France. Erin Rommel (one of the leading German commanders) had speed on his side and drove around the Maginot line and encircling  the 2 out of the 3 main French Tank Divisions. This started The Evacuation of Dunkirk. All of the strong main French divisions were wiped out trying to help the British Evacuate from Dunkirk.

After this, the German tank Divisions had an OK time drifting along the French country side.

They eventually toke Paris, And after time, the French surrendered.

AFTER THE WAR

The Germans Puppeted the French as now known as Vichy France

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were Jewish teachers called?
    10·2 answers
  • How did growing nationalism affect foreign and domestic policies
    7·1 answer
  • La Huelga was significant because
    11·2 answers
  • 1. How did the U.S. government pay for the war effort during World War II? (4 points)
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following animals is the best example of the megafauna that lived during the Pleistocene era?
    14·2 answers
  • Was D-Day a simple or<br> complex operation? How can you<br> Tell?
    15·2 answers
  • Which president made the difficult decision to drop the atomic bomb on japan in world war ii?
    7·1 answer
  • Which phrase correctly describes John Locke's concept of natural rights, which inspired Thomas Jefferson when he wrote the Decla
    9·2 answers
  • Suffragist believed that women should *
    14·1 answer
  • Constitution why is it important to have limits on freedom of speech.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!