The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
Answer:
the ruling class that was developed was called slavery aristocracy. this ensure power for the sultan because the people he enslaved he would train them to become part of his army he also created a bureaucracy
Explanation:
Answer:
I dont know what question you are tryna say here
Explanation:
Answer:
If I am not mistaken, the answer you are looking for is Germany.
Explanation:
Germany ended up having to fight a two-front war. Wedged between France and Russia, they had to strategically advance on both fronts. Though they lost, it is still an incredible feat that they nearly got to Paris.