All categories

3 years ago

Is 3/8 bigger than 15/16

2 answers:

5 0

Yes. The pie is bigger with less people...15/16 is smaller. 3/8 is bigger. The more people, the smaller pieces. Always remember that.

Hope This Helps!!!!!!!

Nadusha1986 [10]3 years ago

4 0

It is not bigger 3/8 is way smaller

You might be interested in

Check whether the relation R on the set S = {1, 2, 3} is an equivalent

kozerog [31]

Answer:

$R$ isn't an equivalence relation. It is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $S$ denote a set of elements. $S \times S$ would denote the set of all ordered pairs of elements of $S\!$ .

For example, with $S = \lbrace 1,\, 2,\, 3 \rbrace$ , $(3,\, 2)$ and $(2,\, 3)$ are both members of $S \times S$ . However, $(3,\, 2) \ne (2,\, 3)$ because the pairs are ordered.

A relation $R$ on $S\!$ is a subset of $S \times S$ . For any two elements $a,\, b \in S$ , $a \sim b$ if and only if the ordered pair $(a,\, b)$ is in $R\!$ .

A relation $R$ on set $S$ is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following:

Reflexivity: for any $a \in S$ , the relation $R$ needs to ensure that $a \sim a$ (that is: $(a,\, a) \in R$ .)

Symmetry: for any $a,\, b \in S$ , $a \sim b$ if and only if $b \sim a$ . In other words, either both $(a,\, b)$ and $(b,\, a)$ are in $R$ , or neither is in $R\!$ .

Transitivity: for any $a,\, b,\, c \in S$ , if $a \sim b$ and $b \sim c$ , then $a \sim c$ . In other words, if $(a,\, b)$ and $(b,\, c)$ are both in $R$ , then $(a,\, c)$ also needs to be in $R\!$ .

The relation $R$ (on $S = \lbrace 1,\, 2,\, 3 \rbrace$ ) in this question is indeed reflexive. $(1,\, 1)$ , $(2,\, 2)$ , and $(3,\, 3)$ (one pair for each element of $S$ ) are all elements of $R\!$ .

$R$ isn't symmetric. $(2,\, 3) \in R$ but $(3,\, 2) \not \in R$ (the pairs in $\! R$ are all ordered.) In other words, $3$ isn't equivalent to $2$ under $R\!$ even though $2 \sim 3$ .

Neither is $R$ transitive. $(3,\, 1) \in R$ and $(1,\, 2) \in R$ . However, $(3,\, 2) \not \in R$ . In other words, under relation $R\!$ , $3 \sim 1$ and $1 \sim 2$ does not imply $3 \sim 2$ .

3 0

3 years ago

Can a linear function be continuous but not have a domain and range of all real numbers

ivolga24 [154]

"Mathematically yes - but from an engineering point no. And micro black holes are very unstable. They will evaporate extremely violently" hope this helps

4 0

3 years ago

Find the domain and range of the relation.<br> {(3,-2) (2,1) (-1,0) (1,3)}

svp [43]

The domain of the inverse of a relation is the same as the range of the original relation. In other words, the y-values of the relation are the x-values of the inverse.

5 0

3 years ago

What is the midpoint of the segment show below?

slega [8]

B is the answer because if u subtact both x and y

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3. Jason earns $400 per week plus a 3% commission on his total sales. If he sold $675 in total sales, how much did he earn this

dlinn [17]

Answer:

$420.25