<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
The correct option is A (Bottom-Up)
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
As indicated by Theoretical Synthesis, "when an upgrade is displayed short and lucidity is unsure that gives an ambiguous boost, discernment turns into a best down methodology." Conversely, brain research characterizes base up handling as a methodology wherein there is a movement from the individual components to the entirety.
Bottom Up Strategic Management. With a best down key methodology, the official group of the business sets up plans and objectives, and afterward imparts that system to center supervisors, who at that point move toward becoming entrusted with executing that procedure through general population representatives.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
hope it helps to your question
Answer:
c. $ 95,000 $ 0
Explanation:
<u>Calculation of cost of land acquired</u>
For the purpose of recording of land acquired in the books of accounts, the accounting values of consideration paid shall be considered as per the generally accepted accounting principles as well as as per International accounting standard (IAS) - 16 'Property, plant and equipment'. Hence the land shall be recorded as per the following amounts:
Consideration paid in cash (A) = $ 5,000
Consideration in kind (land) (B) = $ 90,000 (Refer Note 1)
Total cost of new land (A+B) = $ 95,000
<em>Note 1</em>
Fair value is irrelevant for the purpose of capitalization of asset (IAS-16)
<u>Calculation of Gain/loss on disposal of land</u>
No gain/loss needs to be recorded as the new asset shall be recorded in terms of the book value of old asset (i.e. net impact is already taken into account during the exchange transaction)
<span>The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Bricks Construction might not have enough funds to implement a project int he community, the employees also have difficulty in managing the program, then it will be a difficult to sustain most especially economic's downside."</span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is TRUE that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows for arbitration clauses in employment contracts.
The above statement is echoed in the Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis on May 21, 2018, where the Supreme Court gave its ruling that the FAA is totally enforceable in the individual arbitration agreements contracts.
Similarly, in the case of American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, the court ruled that necessary arbitration clauses are legal.
