Explanation:
what= the immigration act of 1924 limited the number of immigrants allowed entry into the United states through a national origins quota. the quota provided immigration visas to two percent of the total of people of each nationality in the United states as of 1890 census.
why=in the 1920s ,restrictions on immigration increased. the immigration act of 1924 was most severe:it limited the overall number of immigrants and established quotas based on nationality.Among other things, the act sharply reduces immigrants from eastern Europe and Africa.
when=congress passed on emergency quota act in 1921 followed by the immigration act in 1924.
where=approximately half of immigrants living in the united states are from mexico and other latin american countries.
who=immigration to the United states in the late 1800s , between 1870s and 1900, the largest number of immigrants continued to come from northern and western Europe including great britain,scandanavia and ireland. but 'new' immigrants from southern and eastern europe were becoming one of the most important forces in american life.
I believe the answer is D as B and C are just completely false and while A could be possible its not the answer because granting voting rights to former slaves doesn't really punish the south but it does give former slaves suffrage. So its D
Because he was a republican and he wanted to ban slavery which would decrease profit for farmers and force people who owned slaves to pay them.
Answer:
C) They saw slavery as a “positive good” for enslaved workers.
Explanation:
White Southerners safeguarded the foundation of slavery on various fronts. They said that it was important and they said that it was not taboo, yet they likewise contended that it was a positive good. Southerners contended that slavery was a financial need. They contended that there was no real way to get anybody to do the kind of work that was required for tobacco (and later cotton) development without pressuring them. They contended that subjection was in this way totally fundamental for the Southern economy.
The Southerners additionally contended that there was no motivation to believe that slavery was indecent. They looked to somewhere around three sources to help this case. In the first place, they looked to Biblical times. They noted that there was slavery in the Old Testament and the New Testament and that Jesus never opposed the practice. Second, they took a gander at classical antiquity. They contended that the Greeks and the Romans had slaves even as they were the wellspring of Western development. At last, they took a gander at the time of the Founding Fathers. They noticed that the general population who composed the Constitution had slaves. In view of these precedents, they contended that there was no motivation to think slavery wasn't right.
