I'm guessing you're referring to FDR's speech after the attack on Pearl Harbor?
If so, then yes, I would say Americans felt very united after hearing the speech. FDR used language that invoked very strong emotions. He spoke in a way that made Americans feel unified. By speaking about a common enemy like Japan, he made all Americans come together. It was almost like he was saying "here are the bad guys. Let's get together, and let's stop them."
So yes, it was very unifying. Do I think they agreed with him? Yes I do. He worded his speech in such a way that an American would have to be insane to disagree with him. His speech was infused with so much patriotism and nationalism that to not agree with FDR's decision would be seen as unpatriotic and unamerican.
Answer:
The answer should be number 3: The detective is trying to solve a crime, Mr. Macomb is a witness, and large footprints are a clue.
Explanation:
The teenage boy named Fausto, takes advantage of some rich folks. As a result, he is consumed by guilt. The story shows that deep down, people want to do the right thing.
The sentence "I tent camped when I was younger but switched to an RV when I got older," is the one that best presents an evaluative thesis for the prompt.
<h3>What is an evaluative thesis?</h3>
- It is the author's position.
- It is an opinion that shows two aspects.
- It is a statement, which presents a contrary idea shortly after.
The sentence "I tent camped when I was younger but switched to an RV when I got older" shows an evaluative thesis, as it shows an idea contrary to the statement that was initially presented. In other words, we can see that the narrator claims that he was camping in a tent when he was younger. Soon after, he makes a contrary statement, showing that he currently prefers camping in a trailer.
This shows that he has evaluated both accommodations and is now able to present a thesis on them.
More information about evaluative thesis at the link:
brainly.com/question/25806049