Answer:
Should companies continue targeting kids in their advertisement's?
Explanation:
Kids represent an important demographic to marketers because in addition to their own purchasing power (which is considerable) they influence their parents’ buying decisions and are the adult consumers of the future.According to the 2008 YTV Kids and Tweens Report, kids influence: Breakfast choices (97% of the time) and lunch choices (95% of the time). Where to go for casual family meals (98% of the time) (with 34% of kids always having a say on the choice of casual restaurant). Clothing purchases (95% of the time). Software purchases (76% of the time) and computer purchases (60% of the time). Family entertainment choices (98% of the time) and family trips and excursions (94% of the time). As a result, industry spending on advertising to children has exploded over the past two decades. In the United States alone, companies spent over $17 billion doing this in 2009 – more than double what was spent in 1992. Parents today are willing to buy more for their kids because trends such as smaller family size, dual incomes and postponing having children until later in life mean that families have more disposable income. As well, guilt can play a role in spending decisions as time-stressed parents substitute material goods for time spent with their kids.
So you are prepared and understand everything that is said. Also so you can answer any question they ask or need to know.
Answer:
I absolutely want to live forever, and I wish every person I love felt the same way.
Explanation:
1. A paradoxical slowing of the population growth rate because people who live longer start having children later, enough later dampen the exponential effect of having children far more than the linear affect of not dying adds to the population.
2. Vast increase in productivity and wealth. Right now we have to acquire excess over our 40 productive years so we can survive our 20 declining ones. Imagine not having to store away the excess, not to be in the 20 year expensive declining phase. Huge free up in economics.
3. Right now war remains a reasonable choice when the risk is only 30 or so productive years of life. When it's 100s of productive years, few will want to take that risk.
I understand why others don't want to live forever. They have been conditioned to see it as hubris, as tied to evil, and as somehow a tradeoff against humanity. But these were stories. If you go back in your past and examine the stories you'll realize they were done by people with little interest in really understanding how these things would play out, just an interest in getting you scared enough to buy the book or movie ticket.
Make sure they have the right information ? and give details ?