1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nina [5.8K]
3 years ago
11

PLEASE HELP ME FOR REAL

History
1 answer:
Julli [10]3 years ago
5 0
This meant that britons thought that they were the finest and it was their job to get more territory. They wanted more territory to get more of the “finest race”.
You might be interested in
What happened After the Navigation Acts went into effect
Yuki888 [10]
The Dutch were masters of the sea. They dominated trade, especially in England's colonies. Dutch ships, called fluits or flyboats, could ship colonial exports more cheaply, offer a greater variety of imports, and generally provide a level of reliability England could not match. This meant that the Dutch controlled the lion's share of the market and therefore the lion's share of the profits.

This made the English government angry. Parliament and Cromwell wanted to seize the benefits of their colonies' trade. That's why they had colonies after all - to make money off them! The Navigation Acts, they hoped, would eliminate or at least minimize Dutch competition. Dutch ships could no longer pick up colonial exports or bring most imports into England and her colonies.

In passing the Navigation Acts, the English government was also trying to work out a practical application of one of its favorite economic theories, namely, mercantilism. Mercantilism, which first became popular in the 16th century, operated on the following principles:

HOPE I WAS ABLE TO HELP
8 0
3 years ago
25. Which of the following would NOT be considered a valid primary source for us in helping
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Although viking raids were pretty big back then, they do not have much of an impact on European societies today

4 0
3 years ago
Period 1 begins with 1491. If the African Indian population in what is now the United States was nearly 10 million before 1492,
ratelena [41]
American Indians, that is Native Americans, are a very small minority now due to numerous reasons. For starters, many of them died because of the diseases that the colonists brought with them that the natives weren't immune to, like the measles. A large amount of them died when moving westwards as they were kicked out of their land, or in the wars for defending their land. What remains is those who accepted their life in reservations at the time.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT ANSWER
tigry1 [53]

C. the closing of the First Bank of the United States

3 0
3 years ago
6 reasons why the u.s. should not have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima And Nagasaki
zmey [24]
The first bomb, dropped on the city of Hiroshima on 6 August 1945, resulted in a death toll of around 135,000. The second, which hit Nagasaki on 9 August, killed at least 50,000 people – according to some estimates, as many as 74,000 died.<span>It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than 418,000 lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the 135,000 death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops [that] would be killed in invading Japan” – a view attributed to the president himself.</span><span>the US wasn’t justified. Even secretary of war Henry Lewis Stimson was not sure the bombs were needed to reduce the need of an invasion: “Japan had no allies; its navy was almost destroyed; its islands were under a naval blockade; and its cities were undergoing concentrated air attacks.”</span><span>The atom bombs achieved their desired effects by </span>causing maximum devastation<span>. Just six days after the Nagasaki bombing, the Emperor’s Gyokuon-hōsō speech was broadcast to the nation, detailing the Japanese surrender. The devastation caused by the bombs sped up the Japanese surrender, which was the best solution for all parties.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the long-term effect of tariffs or other trade barriers? more food lower prices higher prices more jobs
    5·2 answers
  • which was a source of conflict between mexico and the american settlers in texas in the 1830s? a.american settlers in texas want
    12·2 answers
  • The pyramid at saqqara is different from the pyramids at giza in which of the following ways
    12·2 answers
  • During the gilded age how did the us congress act to regulate business practices
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me with history​
    10·1 answer
  • This is a test so am going to post more later this due tomorrow
    8·2 answers
  • How were the Egyptians and the Kush people similar?
    14·2 answers
  • HELP QUICKLY PLEASE
    6·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE 10 POINTS
    9·1 answer
  • Analyse the role of divine intervention as portrayed by Homer in book 1 of his Iliad and critically examine its consequence(s) a
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!