1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elza [17]
4 years ago
5

What is the long-term effect of tariffs or other trade barriers? more food lower prices higher prices more jobs

History
2 answers:
ratelena [41]4 years ago
8 0

The right answer is higher prices.

Tariffs and trade barriers limit or prevent some types of trade or impede trade with other countries. These often protectionist measures in the long term may increase the commodities or consumer goods with which the country wants to interact, as it creates a situation of estrangement between the two countries that will correlate.

kirill115 [55]4 years ago
6 0
A tariff is a tax on imports that is meant to help consumers and sometime protext national security. In general, over long periods of time, tariffs can lead to more domestic jobs.
You might be interested in
For a time, __________ was an admirer of Mussolini and his political philosophy.
Darya [45]
Adolf Hitler admired how Mussolini ran his country. that's another reason why they were close friends
7 0
3 years ago
Examine and explain the roles of women in reform movements. <br><br> In ur own words!!!
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

Progressive reformers wanted to end political corruption, improve the lives of individuals, and increase government intervention to protect citizens.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Andrew Carnegie seemed to be in favor of taxing large estates heavily at death.<br> True or false?
aalyn [17]
False. As a Captain of Industry and a Robber Baron , Andrew Carnegie was against the heavy taxing of large estates and business. Shown in his book the Gospel of Wealth.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should congress have the power to interpret the constitution
Evgen [1.6K]
No, Congress should not have the power to interpret the Constitution.  The Constitution of the United States of America states that the legislative branch (including Congress) has the power to MAKE laws.  The judicial branch (including the Supreme Court) has the power to INTERPRET laws.  By giving the legislative branch the power to interpret the Constitution, you are giving it the powers of the judicial branch.  This power must belong only to the judicial branch, NOT to the legislative branch or Congress.  (NOTE: I'm not sure if this question is supposed to be a matter of opinion or not--if it is, this is my viewpoint.)
3 0
3 years ago
Which was one factor that contributed significantly to Kennedy's victory in the election of 1960?
Nata [24]

Answer:

2

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did massive numbers of immigrants pour into California in the late 1840s and early 1850s?
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·2 answers
  • Because they continually move about, hunters and gatherers have:
    11·1 answer
  • What is in the north region of Argentina?
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following sparked the french revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • 1. Which accomplishment did the Twenty-sixth Amendment have to increase voting rights in the United States?
    12·1 answer
  • Senator Stephen Douglas said the main idea behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act was popular sovereignty, "the great principle of self-
    9·1 answer
  • Help ASAP!!! I’ll give brainliest
    7·1 answer
  • The original purpose of the U.S. Food
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!