1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
3 years ago
13

What were two outcomes of the treaty of Versailles

History
2 answers:
jolli1 [7]3 years ago
5 0

The Treaty of Versailles was enacted in 1919 as the paece agreeement that ended WWI and it signed between the Allied victorious powers and Germany. Its two major outcomes were the following:

  • Germany, together with its allies, was forced to assume the whole responsibility for all the losses and all the damage caused.
  • Germany had to disarm and renounce to some of its territories. Moreover, war reparations were imposed on Germany, in the form of very large money sums, that had to be paid to the victorious contries.

This treaty was not very sucessful in relieving the tensions that had characterized WWI, and its provisions would be connected to the causes of the subsequent WWII.

MAXImum [283]3 years ago
5 0

The first outcome of the treaty of Versailles is that Germany was forced to pay for the damages the war had caused. The second one is that Germany lost its former colonies in Africa.

 

EXPLANATION:

There are cons and pros of the Treaty of Versailles:

 

List of Cons of the Treaty of Versailles

1. Too Harsh on Germany

Rivals of the treaty demand that the reparation is given to Germany and its associates were plentiful and that the compensation figure was too high. They claim that claiming Germany and the countries that helped the Germans to condemn areas to receive full responsibility on the battle was also over the top.

 

2. Reparation Not Imposed

Commentators of the Treaty of Versailles stated that the treaty had no teeth since it took more than 10 years of negotiations about remunerating repairs to Germany and its associates they have to remunerate. And to make troubles worse, in 1932, an indefinite postponement in compensations to be made was provided to Germany.

 

3. Germany Targeted

According to the people who were not pledged by the treaty, the Allied Powers forced Germany to follow and accept all articles of the Treaty of Versailles asked. Additionally, separated from other nations operating with Germany, the focus of the forfeit and reparation was completely in Germany.

 

Pros of the Treaty of Versailles:

1. Military Restrictions on Germany

With the ratification of this treaty, Germany’s control to attack again and to initiate damage and upcoming wars was restricted. Germany has been resolved and urged to decrease the number of its armies and just has an army of 100,000 people and no more than this for departments of three cavalries and seven infantries. Besides, it triggers the departments and support units of the organization where the General Staff was adjourned. The treaty basically forbade Germany from owning a huge size of people in the military.

 

2. Payment for Reparations

Supporters of the Treaty of Versailles claim that this peace treaty triggers Germany to recompense war victims and the destruction it has affected the countries they conquered. Germany had to pay several countries totaling 132 million Marks or around $ 31.4 billion in 1921 as part of the treaty. This is around $ 442 billion at today's rate of exchange.

 

3. Peace and Territorial Concessions

The authorization of the treaty terminated the war which persuaded people that there is no other battle threat. It also pushed Germany to give up its zone and give back the freedom to the countries it had conquered.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• What were two outcomes of the treaty of Versailles? brainly.com/question/3722366

KEYWORDS : treaty of Versailles, Germany

Subject  : History

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : German History

You might be interested in
The Greek word that means “rule by the people” is
kati45 [8]

Answer:

Explanation:

The meaning of democracy – from the Greek word – demokratia – is “rule by the people”. As a system of government, it is now almost universally commended. To describe a country, or a policy, as “undemocratic” is to criticise it and those countries that are undemocratic are continually urged towards reform.

Yet, democracy is a complex and contested notion. Moreover, until relatively recently, the idea of rule by the people was as much (if not more) feared as loved. The ancient Greek philosopher Plato, for example, related democracy to the rule of unbridled and untutored passions over cool and reflective reason. Invoking a now common image of the ship of state, Plato asks whether a real ship in stormy waters is sensibly governed by a trained captain who has knowledge of seamanship and navigation or by the crew who have no specialist training. This seems a good question, and although such views are no longer part of the currency of intellectual thought, democrats continue to worry about the role of civic education, for example, in moulding a population so that its members do not just rule, but rule by informed decision making.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is chivalry????
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

traditional ideology and code of conduct of knights

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which presidential role allows the president to be leader of the U.S Military
torisob [31]
He can go to war without general or congress approval....
5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
stira [4]

During the <em>colonial</em> era, Europeans settled on the east coast of North America. Their life was difficult because they <em>lacked survival skills and face starvation.</em>

7 0
3 years ago
How are the values between a liberal and a conservative biased viewpoint different?
lubasha [3.4K]
In a base summary, the democrats are less traditional then the republicans. Like gun laws are more restrictive for the left, abortions are more lenient with left, and drugs (like marijuana specifically) are more lenient, with more major ones wanting to be illegal but punished with rehabilitation. The right believes in the enforcement of the second amendment and is more against gay marriage shown by theyre states being some of the last to allow gay marriages. Hope this helps :D
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was augustus's greatest contribution to roman society
    9·2 answers
  • What did Washington, D.C. and Richmond, Virginia have in common ?
    5·1 answer
  • The Proclamation of 1763 prohibited colonists from moving to land
    6·1 answer
  • Gandhi used this type of warfare to defeat the British?​
    6·1 answer
  • How was the great plague and cholera epidemic similar
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Missouri Compromise and how did it lead to division
    5·1 answer
  • HURRY!! ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    13·2 answers
  • What challenges dld Jews who went into hiding face?
    13·1 answer
  • An important impact of the Federalist Papers was that they
    9·2 answers
  • What does the first amendment say about freedom of speech
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!