Answer:
b corvette corvette hop on a motherf jet like that
Explanation:
<span>1. to reduce the amount in blocks or sizeable amounts: decimate
2. food and drink; necessary foods in order to stay alive : sustenance
3. The ancient power structures which were cities that were fortified into independent units of strength : city-states
4. being of nobility or of a privileged upper-class: aristocratic
</span>
Here are your matches:
- JOSEPH STALIN = wanted to prevent future threats from Germany
- WINSTON CHURCHILL = wanted free elections in Eastern Europe
- FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT = wanted Soviet help against Japan
Context/explanation:
US president Franklin Roosevelt, British prime minister Winston Churchill, and Soviet premier Joseph Stalin, the leaders of the Allies in World War II, met at Yalta in February, 1945.
Roosevelt wanted to get Stalin to agree to Russia's entry into the war against Japan -- and Stalin agreed to that (in exchange for the promise of territory returned to Soviet control that had been lost to Japan in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05). Stalin kept that promise. In August 1945, Soviet troops invaded Manchuria to battle occupying Japanese forces there. The Soviets also took control of northern Korea away from the Japanese.
Churchill in particular (along with Roosevelt) pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, ""Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests.
Jefferson's election in 1800 was considered a "republican revolution" because he reversed Federalist policies. Explanation: ... The members of the Electoral College only voted in the president; each voter could vote for two candidates, and the vice president would be the second person
In this extraordinarily strange election year, debating the Electoral College might seem an odd pastime when so many other issues concern us. But its logic, its distortion of the democratic process and its underlying flaws will still strongly influence the conduct of the election. So, let me make the case for its abolition and its replacement by a simple national popular vote, to be held in an entity we will call (what the heck) the United States of America.