The correct answer is the first option - The statue holding the torch is the Statue of Liberty.
You don't need a comma in this sentence because if you separated the phrase <em>holding the torch </em>using commas, then it would mean that phrase is non-essential, when in fact its meaning is very important for this sentence. It is important to know which statue exactly that is - and this is why the phrase should not be separated by commas.
Expending or bestowing profusely; produced in abundance.
Part A:
Answer
One of Roosevelt's purposes was to inform the American people of Japan's attack on the US and other places in the Pacific.
<em>The other possible answer is the one that mentions Japan being an ally of the Nazis, however the word "Nazi" is never mentioned on the speech.</em>
Part B:
Answer
He uses repetition, employing the word ¨attack¨ over and over, to inspire Americans to join the armed forces and aggressively take on the enemy.
<em>This is definitely the rhetoric that applies to advance his purpose from part A. The other options wouldn't apply.</em>
Answer:
Very often things like flashbacks, flash forwards, non-linear narratives, multiple plots and ensemble casts are regarded as optional gimmicks stuck into the conventional three act structure.
Explanation:
More than six ways to turn your idea into a film. Let's imagine that you've read a newspaper article about soldiers contracting a respiratory disease from handling a certain kind of weaponry. You want to write a film about it. Conventional wisdom says create one storyline with one protagonist (a soldier who gets the disease) and follow that protagonist through a three act linear journey. There's no question that you could make a fine film out of that. But there are several other ways to make a story out of the idea, and several different messages that you could transmit - by using one of the parallel narrative forms.
