1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DIA [1.3K]
3 years ago
9

Vidal is an employee of Wild Thing Ranch. Vidal learns that Wild Thing is illegally importing endangered animals to sell as pets

. He reports his employer’s illegal activities but is laid off shortly thereafter and successfully sues Wild Thing for retaliatory discharge. With respect to the employment-at-will doctrine, this is​
a. ​an exception based on public policy.
b. ​an exception based on tort theory.
c. ​an exception based on contract theory.
d. ​an example of the doctrine.
English
1 answer:
Brrunno [24]3 years ago
3 0
I’m almost positive your answer would be (A) please correct me if I’m wrong
You might be interested in
If you are in a conflict, which steps should you take in order to utilize the two tools described in the Conflict Management Ski
BabaBlast [244]

D. Sounds like the best answer

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What characteristics do elisa and the chrysanthemums share
melisa1 [442]
Are we talking about frozen
4 0
3 years ago
What does reiterate mean?
Anna35 [415]

to repeat something

have a good day

:)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main flaw in the sepreme courts reasoning in Plessy v. Ferguson
devlian [24]
N Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms. 

<span>Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a first-class ticket for a trip between New Orleans and Covington, La., and took possession of a vacant seat in a white-only car. Duly arrested and imprisoned, Plessy was brought to trial in a New Orleans court and convicted of violating the 1890 law. He then filed a petition against the judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, at the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the segregation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states from denying "to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," as well as the Thirteenth Amendment, which banned slavery. </span>

<span>The Court ruled that, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law," such equality extended only so far as political and civil rights (e.g., voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e.g., sitting in a railway car one chooses). As Justice Henry Brown's opinion put it, "if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane." Furthermore, the Court held that the Thirteenth Amendment applied only to the imposition of slavery itself. </span>

<span>The Court expressly rejected Plessy's arguments that the law stigmatized blacks "with a badge of inferiority," pointing out that both blacks and whites were given equal facilities under the law and were equally punished for violating the law. "We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy's] argument" contended the Court, "to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it." </span>

<span>Justice John Marshall Harlan entered a powerful -- and lone -- dissent, noting that "in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." </span>

<span>Until the mid-twentieth century, Plessy v. Ferguson gave a "constitutional nod" to racial segregation in public places, foreclosing legal challenges against increasingly-segregated institutions throughout the South. The railcars in Plessy notwithstanding, the black facilities in these institutions were decidedly inferior to white ones, creating a kind of racial caste society. However, in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the "separate but equal" doctrine was abruptly overturned when a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that segregating children by race in public schools was "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement (1955-68), which won social, not just political and civil, racial equality before the law. After four decades, Justice Harlan's dissent became the law of the land. Following Brown, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled racial segregation in public settings to be unconstitutional. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
A friend is coming to your country for the first time and will be arriving just before a national celebration. Write a letter to
enyata [817]

Answer:

A letter to a friend including describing the national celebration and how it is celebrated in my country is written below in detail.

Explanation:

Dear Julius,

I am delighted to write to you today. How are you and the family?

This year's Independence celebration is the best I have undergone all my life. My school is the best and they gave me the best independence day adventure. Every student in my school previously assumed that day because the items of the program and the practices are already records that the day was going to be excellent. The day came and brought no mistake. There were several ventures such as match past, tributes to National protagonists, choreographies, shows, to mention but a few. I took a very important role in addressing the country's post-independence history to the gathering. I was very elated to stand in front of such an august assembly.

Several notable celebrities graced the event with their appearance, people like the administrator for youths and sport, administrator for information and culture, etc.

Nonetheless, I hope to hear back from you on how the independence ceremony was done in your academy too.

Have a fabulous week ahead my good friend.

Your friend,

ABC

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • All of the following people are cartoonists EXCEPT Michael Ramirez John Kerry Marshall Ramsey Gary Markstein
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following replacement for decay has more positive connotation
    11·1 answer
  • 4. The Prefix for recall and regress is? This means?
    14·1 answer
  • When the general had said ""you have won the game."" Were there any alternatives to killing Zaroff?
    14·1 answer
  • Founding a colony in the New World was a grueling and dangerous experience. According to the literature of the Puritans, what he
    12·1 answer
  • Read the following excerpt. Who is likely the narrator of this story? <br> Pls help amigos :0
    5·2 answers
  • Read the sentence below and answer the question.
    14·1 answer
  • What happened between Olivia, Miranda, and Ella?
    13·1 answer
  • She’s been trying to find a good job in the city and she finally succeeds.
    8·1 answer
  • How to find the theme of a poem.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!