Question: The Founders of the United States gave much consideration to the division of responsibility between federal and state governments. They strove to strike a balance between an overbearing central government (such as the British government that had ruled them before the Revolution) and an over reliance on local governments (such as the structure of US government under the Articles of Confederation). Many citizens today continue to debate the correct balance between federal and state government.
What is your position? Name some areas of conflict where you think the powers are improperly balanced. Name some areas where you think the balance works well.
Explanation:
When the framers designed the US Constitution they did not give the Federal government much power so power was balanced between States and Central Government. But the Federal government has gained more and more power over time. At the same time, the States were restricted over the years, when the Framers did not imagine doing so. Both of these situations can be good or bad.
For example, making the States respect the Bill of Rights was a good thing when individuals had their basic rights stripped on a State level. So making only the Federal government respect the Bill of Rights did not make much sense. At the same time, the Federal Government has shown much power that was not designed and showed a few issues over the years, especially with the Executive Branch that had in a few opportunities overstepped its powers.
<span>Followers of the Dharmic religions, B. believe in a constant cycle of life and rebirth. Religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism stress that one must lead a good life because that dictates the next life form one will reincarnate into upon their death. The better life you life, the more desirable your next rebirth will be, vice versa.</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
This statement is not true. It is a false statement because both these sub parts are not small or are not for kids. Both these are adults and are of legal age so they are not applied to juveniles.
Sub part C and D are found guilty of the crime that they have committed and are put behind the bars. They are imprisoned and not applied to juveniles for the modification in their behavior and to change them.
Answer:
Explanation:
Peace of Augsburg was a treatie signed between Charles V, the Diet of the Holy Roman Empire in Augsburg and the Schmalkaldic Leaguer ending the conflict between Roman Catholics and Lutherans in Germany which leadm to religion tolerance and made it possible for rulers of the Holy Roman Empire to choose between Lutheranism Protestantism or Catholicism as the official religion of their state or as their choice of belief.This peace agreement was sign in 1555 in city of Augsburg
The Edict of Nantes was a law promulgated at Nantes in Brittany which put a temporary end to religious wars and conflict between Roman Catholics and French Protestants which was signed in April 1598 by King Henry IV of France which grant French Protestants actual rights in the nation as thiern counterpart in order to encourage and promote religion and civil unity in the nation.
Peace of Westphalia was a series of peace treaties signed between May and October 1648 which aim to put an end to the years llong wars among the European (Eighty Years'War among Spain and the Dutch and the German) which brought about the recognition of the full territorial sovereignty of the member states and religion tolerance.
Each of the above treaties or agreement help to promote and strength secular belief among various nations
D. they had pyramids and palaces in their centers
