Please regard that the comparison table is missing, but I'll give you a general idea. First, the comparison must be made according to the following aspects: cost, utility, model, and convenience of the car. In the same way, it is necessary to know if you are buying a used or a new one from the dealer. According to this, the utility of the Volkswagen depends on the type of model, and its final use. If someone were going to buy a family car, the Volkswagen would offer more space, a better design, a good speed and more convenient price than a mini cooper. If instead, the person seeks to buy the car just for him and to travel, maybe the Cooper is more convenient for its speed, but it is usually a more expensive car even without taking into account the model and year of manufacture. So that, the Jetta has the advantage of size, price, utility, and warranty, that although the Cooper also meets the last two, its high price and size would not work for a family car.
Answer:
Explanation:
WW2 was a new age for women. They had to take over the men's work while they went and fought. So socially, women were the head and they needed to not only run the house but run the work place too.
Economically, most of the money was used for the war. Supplies, gear, etc. That's why there were so many ration cards and so many people made gardens so they didn't have to pay so much for groceries.
The option that is an example of spillover costs is A. a manufacturer continues to pollute a river because it does not pay the costs for cleaning it.
<u>'Spillover costs' refers to a consequence that affects a third party that has not taken part in a decision</u>. In other words, 'spillover costs' makes reference to the damage provoked by another person to a third party. This idea is often used to talk about pollution, as it happens in option A). In this case,<u> the consequences of pollution experienced by the third party, who must pay the costs for cleaning pollution, are the spillover costs</u>.
The correct answer is letter B
Explanation: Engel v. Vitale decided that is unconstitutional for state authorities to compose an official school prayer and encourage recitation in public schools.
