I"m not really sure but i think the answer is C.
The similarity between the two Industrial Revolutions is that they both involved an increase in the degree to which machines were being used to do tasks that had once been done in other ways. Yes, there were differences in that the earlier Industrial Revolution was more about things capital goods like steam engines while the second was about consumer goods. But, in both cases, the main thing that was going on was an increase in the use of machinery. This is what they have in common and what makes it legitimate to call both of these "Industrial Revolutions."
1. The agreement of Defense Alliance which is contained if one country being attacked then the <span>allies must helping.
2. Imperialism which is mean when a country try to colonize another country to take all the natural resources for themself
3.Militarism which is mean the war of weapon.
4. Nasionalism it caused by Slavia nation in Bosnia and Hergezovina don't want to be a part of Austria-Hungaria, but they want to be a part of Serbia, but mostly every countries in Europe were trying to prove their domination and their power
(sorry my english not really good,,hope you can understand)
</span>
This is a matter of opinion.
If you think yes, you could argue that internment was a great PR move and/or that it protected the Japanese living in America from negative press
If you argue no (which I would) then you could argue that it was unconstitutional and/or had no strategic importance to the war itself.
