Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
On Sep 1
Cash $500
To Sales revenue $500
(Being the sale is recorded))
On Sep 1
Cost of goods sold $200
To Finished goods inventory $200
(Being the the cost of mower sales is recorded)
On Sep 1
Warranty expense (8% × $500) $40
To Warranty liability $40
(Being the estimated warranty expense is recorded)
On Jan 24
Warranty liability $35
To Repair parts inventory $35
(being the cost of warranty repairs is recorded)
Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
Answer:
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= $22,000 favorable
Explanation:
<u>To calculate the direct labor efficiency variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)*standard rate
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (3*8,000 - 22,000)*11
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (24,000 - 22,000)*11
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= $22,000 favorable
Answer:
total value of ending WIP inventory: 8,400
Explanation:
unit material cost: 5.00 dollar
ending work in proces inventory
materials equivalent units:
1,500 x 100% = 1,500
as the mateirals are added entire at the beginning of the process:
material cost: 1,500 x 5 = 7,500
conversion
1,500 x 20% = 300
300 x 3.00 = 900
total value of ending WIP inventory:
materials 7,500
conversion 900
total 8,400
