All categories

3 years ago

EB5.

Business

1 answer:

lord [1]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Material used 2,500

Direct labour 5,000

Overhead applied 200

Cost of goods sold 7,700

Explanation:

The overhead applied is the difference between cost of goods sold and cost of material used and direct labour. The cost of goods sold is $7,700 while the cost of material and labour is $7,500. The difference of $200 represents the overhead applied.

You might be interested in

1. Identify the factors that impact the social responsibility policies implemented by businesses.

andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer:

Number one is the answer

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

1. Question 1 Your aunt is thinking about opening a hardware store. She estimates that it would cost $500,000 per year to rent t

Blizzard [7]

Answer:

B. What must be given up to acquire it

Explanation:

The opportunity cost is the cost which is to be sacrificed to gain for some better option

Since in the given case the aunt is thinking to open a hardware store but it will cost her $500,000 for rent and the to purchase the stock

And, also she also have to quit her accountant job for $50,000

So in this option quitting the job is to be considered as an opportunity cost

7 0

3 years ago

An investor is considering two investment, an office building and bonds. He can only invest on of them. The possible return from

Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

1) Calculate the expected return and variance of investing in office building.

expected return:

$50,000 x 0.3 = $15,000

$60,000 x 0.2 = $12,000

$80,000 x 0.1 = $8,000

$10,000 x 0.3 = $3,000

$0 x 0.1 = $0

expected return = $38,000

$50,000 - $38,000 = -$12,000² = $144,000,000

$60,000 - $38,000 = -$22,000² = $484,000,000

$80,000 - $38,000 = -$42,000² = $1,764,000,000

$10,000 - $38,000 = -$28,000² = $784,000,000

$0 - $38,000 = -$38,000² = $1,444,000,000

expected variance: (0.3 x $144,000,000) + (0.2 x $484,000,000) + (0.1 x $1,764,000,000) + (0.3 x $784,000,000) + (0.1 x $1,444,000,000) = $43,200,000 + $96,200,000 + $176,400,000 + $235,200,000 + $144,400,000 = $695,400,000

standard deviation = √$895,800,000 = $26,370

2) Calculate the expected return and variance of investing in bonds.

expected return:

$30,000 x 0.4 = $12,000

$40,000 x 0.6 = $24,000

expected return = $36,000

$30,000 - $36,000 = -$6,000² = $36,000,000

$40,000 - $36,000 = $4,000² = $16,000,000

expected variance: (0.4 x $36,000,000) + (0.6 x $16,000,000) = $14,400,000 + $9,600,000 = $24,000,000

standard deviation = √$24,000,000 = $4,899

3) Based on the expected return we should choose investing in a building, but if we consider the variance and the standard deviation of the investments, I would choose investing in bonds. The difference in expected returns is not that large (only $2,000) but the variance and standard deviations of investing in the office buildings is quite large, meaning that the risk is very high.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following statements regarding GDP is correct?

nirvana33 [79]

Answer:

Correct option is (a)

Explanation:

GDP or Gross domestic product includes monetary value of all goods and services produced within a country. It includes all private and public investments and exports less taxes and imports.

Option b, c and d are incorrect as GDP accounts for only domestic production and not foreign activities. Details about how income is distributed is not given by GDP. GDP provides details about economic condition of the nation. GDP does not indicate wholesome well being of the nation like human development, infant mortality and standard of living.

GDP accounts for factory production but does not account for any production carried out at the cost of environmental degradation.

3 0

2 years ago

why do you think business organization need to hire people? write at least three sentence in your answer sheet.pls

vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

So why does a company hire a person?

Explanation:

It isn’t to have more people around. The goal of any company isn’t to rack up its number of employees. In fact, the goal of most companies is generally the exact opposite to that, to have the fewest employees possible it needs to be successful.

Less and less do companies hire because they need a very specific task done. In the days of old, companies would hire someone to do the same task over and over again, like hammering the same nail to connect the same two parts all day long. Most of those jobs now are automated, as employers have found cheaper and often more productive alternatives to humans for that work.

No, to understand why employers hire, instead of just using a piece of software or a robot, one first has to understand the unique value proposition a human has. What is it? Well, really it has everything to do with our brain, and our unique ability to conjure up creative solutions to complex problems.

An employer hires a person because their unique value proposition, i.e. generally their ability to think, fixes a business problem they face and there are no other cheaper or more effective alternatives.

For example, a company hires a marketer because they face a business problem: a lack of customers. The marketer’s job is to increase the amount of customers anyway they can, whether it be through email marketing, social media, publicity stunts, etc. The marketer’s job is to constantly solve a problem – in this case getting more customers – that cannot be solved by a machine.

Because most of the jobs that require minimal thought have become or soon will become automated, the jobs that are left require someone who is creative, can learn quickly and is always willing to adapt to new problems thrown their way. So the question therein lies for the employer: how do you figure out who those people are?

The answer is not to look at a pile of resumes and select the two or three best to bring in for an interview. The answer is to screen all candidates through an interview, perhaps best done using a program like VoiceGlance, and ask them challenging questions that reveal those candidates’ line-of-thinking. With that information, companies can discover the employees they really want – the problem solvers – who will lead them to success.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers