The probability of a loss occurring can be reduced my loss prevention
Answer:
$4,000
Explanation:
The computation of amount of Virginia's casualty loss is shown below:-
If property is personal property or is not absolutely destroyed, then the amount of loss of casualty is the lower of:
1. The adjusted asset base, or
2. Reducing the fair market value of the property as a result of the incident
But loss of casualty, should be decreased by any salvage value by any insurance or even other reimbursement that you obtain or consider.
Basis = $14,000
Decrease in fair market value = $10,000
Lower of above = $10,000
From insurance company the Reimbursement is = 6000
So, the Loss of Casualty = $10,000 - $6,000
= $4,000
Answer: D. Before a product or strategy can be recommended, the registered representative must understand and be able protect the client against the product's inherent risks
Explanation:
There are some reviews with regards to FINRA suitability determinations whihc include:
• Reasonable Basis Suitability: This implies that after there has been a review of the returns, risks and costs of a product, the ones that has the best combination should be recommended.
Also, before a product can be recommended to a customer, the customer must be able to meet the financial commitment. The statement that "Before a product or strategy can be recommended, the registered representative must understand and be able protect the client against the product's inherent risks" is incorrect.
Answer:
Extracurricular Activity
Colleges prefer students who are active in academics as well as off it. This shows diversity in the student and is a trait that the counselors would be looking for.
Extracurricular activities like after-school jobs, sports and even volunteering at NGOs weigh heavily in the assessment of a student's ability to fit in a college and if you had great grade whilst doing these activities, you will have a better chance at being admitted.
Answer:
The appellate court did not rule in favor of Hall. Instead, it upheld the lower court's rulings. When Hall appealed up to the Supreme Court, the highest court affirmed Hall's conviction and sentencing.
This shows that there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment in Hall's case. In addition, the prosecution established the existence of probable cause in the absence of a valid warrant to search and obtain evidence that would establish the case against Terrence Hall, leading to his eventual conviction.
Explanation:
Although, the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution protects an individual from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures. It only guarantees against searches and seizures that are regarded as legally unreasonable. This implies that there may be probable cause for searches and seizures.
