Answer:
Emile Durkheim
Explanation:
Emile Durkheim work primarily focused on how people can remain moral where social traditions and religious ties are not assumed. He made sociology be accepted as a legitimate science.
His theories were based on the concept of structural functionalism. He believed that social science needs to study the actions of the masses of people and not the individual.
Hence, the question is referring to Emile Durkheim.
A employment option that would give Robert greater access to potential clients in all geographic locations would be to conduct online coaching and personal training.
<h3 /><h3>What are the functions of a coach?</h3>
This professional's main objective is the personal or professional development of a client through the application of a methodology to achieve a certain goal.
Therefore, through online coaching and personal training, military veteran Robert can reach a wide audience regardless of geographic location, helping young people prepare for military service.
Find out more information about coach here:
brainly.com/question/26164090
I believe the answer is: Congress/legislators
In order to create a new government, a society need to establish a body that had the authorization to create regulation that must be followed by its people. Because of this, the existence of congress (which filled with all delegates from states) are necessary so each states could be represented during the law making process.
Answer:
A correlation is only a mathematical means of describing the relationship between variables. When it is a positive correlation, it means when the value of one increases, for example, the value of the other variable also increases or when one decreases, so does the other. A negative correlation would show that as one variable increases in value, the other decreases. These relationships are non-causal as you're not manipulating variables to control them to see what is causing this relationship. Sometimes, non-causal covariance (or variables that don't have an effect on each other vary cooincidentally in a pattern-like fashion, when there is actually another variable causing the relationship going on.
Explanation:
In the case of this example, it is doubtful that having money causes you to have a higher grade point average. So while we see an increase in grade point average with those who have high income it could be due to other factors, like people with more money have access to learning tools, tutors and other things that people with less money don't have access to. So it is access to tools, not money that is actually causing a difference. There are likely dozens if not hundreds of other potential confounded variables that could be causing this observation.