<span>Britain entered WWI under a moral and legal obligation to protect Belgium, under the treaty of London signed in 1839. After the German invasion of Belgium in 1914, Britain decided to come to the aid of Belgium and France and subsequently declared war on Germany.Britain suffered horrendous casualties, lost much of its vast wealth, and surrendered her paramount position as the leading power of the world. But without Britain's effort, Germany would have dominated western Europe. Therefore, for moral, legal and strategic reasons, Britain's participation in the first world war was justified.
</span><span>Assassination of Archduke was the event that sparked the outbreak of World War I. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "4". The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand occurred on 28th July of the year 1914. Franz Ferdinand was the heir to Austro Hungarian Empire and he was shot dead along with his wife by Gavrilo Princip in Sarajevo. Gavrilo was a Bosnian Serb nationalist. This incident is considered the main reason behind the outbreak of the first world War. The war left around 17 million dead and about 20 million people wounded.
</span>
The Declaration of Independence
It is true that the mass production was a major aspect of the Industrial Revolution, which made goods available to more people faster and cheaper.
<u>Explanation:</u>
During the time of the industrial revolution, the most important aim of the manufacturers was to produce the goods in a mass quantity. With the mass production of the goods, it led to the fall in the prices of the goods and also led to the production to be in an efficient way.
The manufacturers came out with innovative ways to produce the goods which led to the goods to be produced faster and in a cheaper way which reduced the prices.
The statement is referring to Korea. Capitalist South Korea thrived in the economy, while its northern communist neighbor, which followed a policy of isolationism, declined in most aspects.
While being help in prison before conviction, King's DNA was logged and used in court. Unfortunately for King his DNA matched the DNA of a male who took a woman without her consent.
The supreme court ruled King's right to privacy (4th Amendment) was more critical than Maryland's interest in convicting him for his crime. Odd case.
