1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gelneren [198K]
3 years ago
14

Use the cost-benefit analysis table to answer the question: Should Mrs. Baxter allow her students to take an open-book test? Whi

ch of the following would best fill the blank space? Mrs. Baxter may have to reteach material. Mrs. Baxter will not need to proctor the exam. Parents may be happier with grades. Parents will encourage children to study
Social Studies
2 answers:
lutik1710 [3]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Using the cost-benefit analysis table to answer the question: should Mis. Baxter allow her students to take an open-book test the best option to fill the blank pace is: Mrs. Baxter may have to reteach the material.

Explanation:

First of all, let's analyze the context and the answers.

In this case, let's consider the first option. It doesn't matter if the students obtain better results if she instead applied a closed-book test. Increasing the notes the students would obtain wouldn't mean they learned the correct answer. But that they know how to find information. So it is the most logical considering the cost-benefit analysis.

The second option says that Mrs. Baxter wouldn't need to proctor the exam. But just because it is an open book test doesn't mean students won't feel insecure about their answers and won't copy from classmates, so it's wrong.

Parents may be happier with grades. This could be a good choice but may is such an ambiguous answer that doesn't say anything. It is a tricky answer we have a 50% chance they would be happier with nice grades, but if asked her the reason they wouldn't be happy. So, it's wrong because, in the end, she didn't test their knowledge.

Fourth option Parents will encourage children to study. They could provide them reinforcement for good performance but not encourage them. They would encourage them if they performed badly. Also if they knew how they obtained it, they would definitely know they were not tested and would have a reason to be rewarded. So it is also wrong.

DochEvi [55]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Mrs. Baxter may have to reteach material.

Explanation:

This is correct i just took the test and got 100%

You might be interested in
Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows. A map of the United States. Lines cross the country, traveling throu
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

B. The US Interstate Highway System

Explanation:

Although you did not present the map to which this question refers, we can confirm that a map showing lines crossing the American states, refers to the US interstate highway system, as this system has the ability to link states efficiently. across the country, presenting different paths that generate different connections.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do some states have more electoral vote
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

Because some states have more senators and representatives.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How is India today similar to and different from what Gandhi envisioned for the country?
REY [17]

Answer:

Eighty years ago, Mahatma Mohandas Gandhi, writing of the India he envisioned and dedicated his life to building, mused that an ideal village would be one that enjoyed ‘perfect sanitation.’

It was no idle wish. Gandhi had seen the danger caused by inadequate sanitation and hygiene. He had seen the disease and subsequent malnourishment it causes, the lives and wellbeing of millions of Indians, especially children and other vulnerable people. He had also seen the impact of open-defecation on the safety and dignity of women and girls. And he understood that these were not only injuring individuals – they were holding back India’s economic and social progress as well.

Today, as the nation and indeed, the world, celebrate Gandhi’s birthday, his dream of perfect sanitation for India may be closer to becoming a reality than ever before.

Explanation:

Three years ago, the Government of India declared war on open defecation, launching the Swachh Bharat – or Clean India – Mission with the ambitious goal of achieving an open defecation-free India by 2019. In a nation where millions of people still lack basic sanitation and hygiene, the goals of SBM may seem unachievable. But the scale and pace of the progress achieved by the thus far is high.

Already, five States and nearly 250,000 villages in 200 districts have been declared open defecation-free – ODF – with more soon to follow. The increase in sanitation facilities is no less impressive: The Government of India reports that latrine coverage has gone from 39 per cent to over 69 per cent. Every hour, an estimated 3300 toilets are being built in India – nearly one toilet every second.

But it’s not enough to build toilets; people need to use them. For this reason, behaviour change is a centerpiece of the Swachh Bharat Mission. The government and its partners are fielding “sanitation armies” to drive community awareness and action. Bollywood stars and cricket legends have joined the effort – including UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador Sachin Tendulkar. Public health initiatives like the UNICEF-supported campaign are breaking through where traditional efforts have failed. In fact, the whole of Indian society is being mobilized to end open defecation.

The Government is leaving nothing to chance. It has put in place a rigorous system to verify not only that a community, district or State is ODF – but that it remains ODF. A recent survey conducted by the Quality Council of India shows that in communities verified as ODF, usage of toilets remained above 91 per cent.

The stakes are very high – and especially for India’s youngest citizens. The World Health Organization estimates that 117,000 Indian children under the age of five died in 2015 from diarrheal diseases caused by unimproved sanitation and hygiene. This represents 22 per cent of the global burden. More than one in three children in India today are , often due to the impact of chronic diarrhea caused by exposure to fecal matter. This affects both their physical and development, undermining their ability to learn and later, to earn a living.

Because ending open-defecation is not only a matter of smart health policy. It is also smart social and economic policy. A 2008 World Bank study showed that the total economic impact of inadequate sanitation in India amounted to US$ 53.8 billion per year – the equivalent of 6.4 per cent of India’s GDP during the same period. UNICEF just completed a study showing that when costs and benefits are compared over a ten-year period, savings realized through improved sanitation exceed costs by 4.3 times – a four-fold return for every rupee spent.

These financial benefits have a direct impact on families. The same UNICEF analysis – based on data from 10,000 households across 12 States – shows that households using a toilet are saving on average around 50,000 rupees (around US$760) per year, realized in medical costs averted, the value of time saved in not needing to seek medical treatment, and the value of deaths averted. For poor rural families in India, this represents a small fortune.

Crucially, the UNICEF study indicates that improving hygiene and sanitation for the poorest households brought the greatest immediate health benefits, since children living in poverty are at the greatest risk of diarrheal diseases, s

and death.

The challenges India still faces to become open-defecation free are substantial. But India is showing that it can be done. And it must. Not only in India, but everywhere that open defecation destroy lives and futures.

If we are serious about realizing the promise of the SDGs, we need to work together to realize Gandhi’s dream – for India and for the world.

6 0
3 years ago
The form of culture in which humans modify the environment to suit our wants and needs is referred to as
nydimaria [60]
The form of culture in which humans modify the environment to suit our wants and needs is referred to as technology. It is also called the material culture. It is a type of culture which is defined by the physical things, resources and spaces that the people are using. This involves physical modification of the environment for it to suit our wants and needs. This includes, schools, cities, offices, churches, temples, factories, tools, goods and products, production means, clothes and many others. These things would reflect historical, social and geographic conditions of the people which are used to describe this group.
7 0
3 years ago
True or false, Minoan built many towwns, each centered in a palace
bagirrra123 [75]
I’m pretty sure that it’s false but I could be wrong
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The right of the petition the government means that
    5·2 answers
  • There are a number of things which i think suggest, at a minimum, that there's a little froth in this market
    7·1 answer
  • What event closely resembles shays rebellion?
    5·1 answer
  • Which is NOT something that makes a story newsworthy?
    10·1 answer
  • How do funeral practices impact local and global communities, with particular attention to the intersection of environmental iss
    6·1 answer
  • Compare the reforms of the Tanzimat era with the program of the Young Turks
    8·1 answer
  • How to avoid a hitchhiker
    5·1 answer
  • What happened between 1820 and 1914? What was this called?
    11·1 answer
  • Between 1846 and 1855 the population of Ireland decreased by a third, including the
    5·1 answer
  • Examine the concept of the poor <br><br>​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!