Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Because they want them to know politics for when they get older and they want to know your political view
I know that this is correct because I live in Michigan. The capital is Lansing, it was moved from Detroit when it collapsed. Plz mark brainliest, I need it to rank up!
Answer:
The correct answer is -The team leader did not assess the skills of the team members.
Explanation:
In this case, Barack is stressed due to the fact that he is not confident about the part he is responsible for the project is out of his expertise this is the reason that the project is due one week. It is the role of the team leader to assess the skills and ability of the team members and assigns the role as per the skills they are good and confident about. In this case, the team leader did not play his role of assessing the skills of team members which causes stress.
