Answer:
Part a. The graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b. The values in table model a proportional relation.
3.5 minutes per mile.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part a.
The graph shown in the question representing Janet's data is not a straight line although it passes through the origin.
That is why the rate of change of distance with time is not constant.
Therefore, the graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b.
If we plot the data in the table using distance in miles along the y-axis and time in minutes along the x-axis, then we will get a straight line passing through the origin.
So, the values in the table model a proportional relation.
Now, Tarik's unit rate in minutes per miles will be
minutes per mile. (Answer)
Answer:
25
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
B.) $58
Step-by-step explanation:
350-89-18-27-38-120 = 58
Answer:
<em><u>
</u></em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Note
<h2>Area of a cone = 1/3pir squared * height</h2>