I would argue that the scientific method wasn't very revolutionary during the scientific revolution seeing as it existed for hundreds of years. i think it was one of the ancient Greek or roman philosophers that first developed a series of thought that closely resembles the scientific method we know today. however another interpretation of the question is in the definition of revolution. the scientific revolution wasn't bloody like the British/french/american revolution. however the " dictionary definition" of revolution is completing an orbit. in that sense you could consider the scientific revolution a misnomer. in conclusion i think that the ways in which the scientific revolution differed from other revolts are numerous.
Federalism refers to the sharing of power between state and national governments. Federalism is the division of power between two separate governmental authorities, <u>the nation, and the states</u>. In creating numerous governments on many levels, federalism increases the ability of the masses to participate by voting and holding office.
<em>The founders believed that the dispersing of power among different sets of leaders (national, state, and local) would offer more protection from tyranny. It also helps party competition.</em>
Answer:
לכן, כאשר אתה משתמש במנגפקה עם נחל ג'יימס סאראוואק הוא יעבוד ב 32 °
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Middle ages in the European context is the age of feudalism which started with the fall of the Roman Empire and lasted up-to-the renaissance period. During the Roman period, subjects feel safe under the protection of King but the situation changed in 476 A.D with the fall of the Roman Empire. Raids from the Vikings, Magyar and Mongols, and other invaders made people to seek protection under the local lords and here began the system of feudalism in Europe.
The answer is A
i'm filling out character space now
