On September 1st, 1939 Germany invaded Poland.
That statement IS arguable because not everyone would agree and also NOT defensible since theres no proof to back it up with, so the answer would be (D)
Beaver, otter, and mink furs
Answer:
D. Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces, but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not
Explanation:
The genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda are part of the numerous genocides that took place in the past several decades. The genocide in Bosnia was initiated by Serbian nationalist, and it was toward the Muslims and the Croatians. The international community did reacted though to stop it, and sent its military forces in order to put things under control. The genocide in Rwanda though took another course. The Hutu started to perform genocide over the Tutsi minority, but the international community was hesitating should it react or not, if it does in which way, and while it was thinking the genocide was going on and on. Luckily for the Tutsi people, they had their own military forces that were well equipped, so they managed to stop the aggression form the Hutu before they made a full scale genocide.
