Answer:
It is widely recognized that foreign and domestic issues are now powerfully joined. But we need to fully understand how they intersect and what that means for the world. Earlier this year, the Geoeconomics and Strategy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace launched a series of case studies to help policy experts answer this fundamental question:
Are significant changes to U.S. foreign policy required to better advance the economic interests of America’s middle class?
Leading up to the U.S. presidential 2020 election, candidates will be seeking direction on how best to address Americans’ struggles amid uncertain domestic and global environments. However, before policy experts across the political spectrum share their views, they should first test their long-held assumptions about the economic fortunes of America’s middle class and how various U.S. foreign policies may impact them. Local economies across the country look very different today than they did in past decades, and sticking with traditional approaches, or radically departing from them, might ultimately do more harm than good.
Explanation:
General MacAuthur made a brillant counterattack on North Korea at the port of <span>Inchon.</span>
The Black Sea. Constantinople is the ancient name for Istanbul, Turkey.
Answer:
At the time of the Boston Massacre, John Adams was a patriot grieving the loss of a child with a new baby on the way. Why did he risk his family's livelihood to represent the British soldiers? Dan Abrams: The main reason was that he felt everyone was entitled to a defense
Explanation:
At the time of the Boston Massacre, John Adams was a patriot grieving the loss of a child with a new baby on the way. Why did he risk his family’s livelihood to represent the British soldiers?
Dan Abrams: The main reason was that he felt everyone was entitled to a defense. But I also think he learned a little about the case and thought there was a legitimate defense—because the events were not as clear cut as some patriots wanted to make them out to be. He also knew there were a couple of attorneys who said they would take the case as long as he was part of the team.
hope this help anyone in need plz mark brainliest
Answer: Whether teachers could teach about the Darwinian theory of evolution.
Explanation:
The Scopes trial of 1925 was to prosecute high school science teacher John Scopes under a new law that had been passed in Tennessee that made teaching students about the Darwinian theory of evolution illegal.
The trial saw former presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan go up against Clarence Darrow as attorneys on opposing sides with both of them being the best orators of the time.
The trial ended with John Scopes being found guilty even though this was overturned.
