Answer:
Consumption ratios for the four drivers in relation to both the cards will be consumption for a particular card/total consumption for both the cards which will be as follows :-
Total consumption for Inspection = 140 + 60
= 200
Total consumption for Setup = 60 + 20
= 80
Total consumption for Machine = 180 + 650
= 830
Total consumption for Number of moves = 230 + 60
= 290
Hence,
Consumption ratios for Inspection hours:
Scented Cards =
= 0.7
Regular Cards =
= 0.3
Consumption ratios for Setup hours:
Scented Cards =
= 0.75
Regular Cards =
= 0.25
Consumption ratios for Machine hours:
Scented Cards =
= 0.22
Regular Cards =
= 0.78
Consumption ratios for Number of moves:
Scented Cards =
= 0.79
Regular Cards =
= 0.21
Answer:
(A) demanders of loanable funds, they must borrow from households.
Explanation:
The firms are the one which do business of producing goods, or of providing services, it basically need money to run their business. Therefore, it demands money and borrows from banks or households, from households by issuing bonds, shares to individual investors etc:.
This clearly states that the firms are the one's who take loans and then the returns are paid to government in the form of taxes.
Thus, the correct option is :
Statement A
Answer:
Assuming a range of interest rates 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%
The below listed are the Net present Values
Project A
1,175
1292
1382
1451
1505
1549
Project B
760
261
-100
-387
-602
-769
Project C
1,110
494
52
-274
-519
-708
The Net Present Value of a project is the evaluation of a project Net Cash flows based on time value of money and bench-marked against the required rate of return the business considers minimum.
The attached document shows the detailed answer for your review
+
+
Answer:
The statement that would prove that Zeke made a faulty decision is that Both an employee and a a former employee can raised a grievance
Explanation:
Based on the information given about Zeke who is the employer , Gavin the employee and the formal employee who was dismissed The statement that would prove that Zeke the employer made a faulty decision is that Both an employee and the former or ex employee can raised a grievance reason been that settling dispute due to Grievance at a place of work can only take place with a current employee and not a formal employee , ex employee or a dismissed employee.
Therefore resolving Grievance at a place of work often take place with an employee with in the work environment and not with a formal employee.