The following sentence is punctuated properly: "I need to know whether you are able to perform the following functions of the job: revising existing marketing materials, promoting the company at trade shows, and reaching potential customers through direct mail campaigns." (3).
There should be a colon after the first clause because the second part of the sentence is a list of items (in this case, a list of the "functions of the job").
A comma would be too weak in this case because it would fail to express this idea of a list of specific examples completing the independent clause.
A semicolon would be inaccurate because they are usually used between two independent clauses when you don't want to link them with a conjunction (like <em>and</em>). They are stronger than a comma and weaker than a period. In this sentence however, the second part is not an independent clause but a list without a verb.
When you have information from one source that will be used in consecutive sentences, the information should be cited as one in-text citation at the end of the second sentence only. Multiple in-text citations to the similar work over a large piece of text can be visually clashing and is not fully compulsory.
The rule of thumb is to cite the very first sentence, make it clear you are still talking about the same work in your consecutive sentences and then make sure you are still talking about the work by adding another citation at the end (if this has continued for several sentences).
to know more about in-text citation click below
brainly.com/question/17615328
#SPJ4
It’s taste salty and good :)
Answer:
It is this one: China's one-child policy has had an impact on families since it was instituted in 1970 to control population growth.
