When deciding for whom to produce, the consideration that must be addressed is WHO NEED THE PRODUCT THAT IS TO BE PRODUCED.When a decision has been made about what to produce, the producer must target a particular set of individuals or a specific population of the economy who are going to be the users of the product he want to produce. This specified population will be the primary consumers that the producer is targeting for his product. For instance, a producer that want to start producing pampers will be targeting mainly pregnant women and nursing mothers for his product.
Answer:
umm so what you need to do is
Explanation:
w8 lemme open my book....
ok yea so
2+2=5
1×1=11
5+11=511
so your answer is 511
The correct answer is D. Emotion
Explanation:
In poetry, the rhythm refers to the musicality or cadence of a poem that is created through the meter of a poem, which is the number of syllables in each verse or line and the different combinations created using unstressed and stressed syllables. In general terms, the main purpose of the rhythm is to provide flow and beat to the poem, which is linked to the mood or emotions a poem evokes in the reader, in this way, a slow rhythm provided by the use of short or unstressed syllables supports emotions such as melancholy or sadness while the use of stressed syllables support other emotions such as excitement. Considering this, it can be concluded a poem's rhythm is often used to communicate emotion.
Yes the comment above me is Correct
Answer:
Glendale was not able to prove that the ordinance directly advanced the claim of interest in public safety.
Explanation:
Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale is a case in which Christopher Pagan wanted to sell his car and put a for sale sign on it and parked it on a city street. Because of this, he received a notice that his car was in violation of a city ordinance that didn't allow him to do this. He filed a suit claiming that the law was unconstitutional because it violated his First Amendment right. Pagan won because Glendale couldn't provide enough evidence that the ordinance had the goal of avoiding a potential harm. It was considered that the law didn't serve a government interest in public safety.
