<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that Peter the Great had a more lasting impact since he modernized the nation, where as Louis the XIV was deposed. </span>
There are many reasons but here's two
1. The 'war' and invasion etc was fought in the West so the province that you are going to have to raise troops and revenue from to fight the war is the same one where all the fighting takes place.
Meanwhile the 'East' had Anatolia as a heartland for revenue and recruits that was untouched .
<span>2. There is alot of evidence that it wasn't simply 'barbarian' invasion but also a large element of rebellion against central authority by local forces. These are the people who are supposed to supply your troops and revenue.</span>
Answer:
I would live under a democracy, Because you have lots of rights. Such as freedom of speech, press, protest, and religion. And you will have much more rights than you would in any other form of government.
Explanation:
If we are talking about the reconstruction period, the Radical republicans wanted to ensure an absolute right to vote to all African-Americans, as well as giving them land and education as a mandatory thing. Moderate ones didn't want to agitate the southerners too much so they didn't want to give them land, and when it comes to education, it was open to them but was not mandatory for African-Americans to go to school.
A grassroots movement is a political or economic movement that starts and works on a LOCAL LEVEL.
