Answer: ok ill try, but this is from my perspective so you might have different answers. also im writing a shorter essay and not a real one, this is just an example :)
Explanation:
Italian political writer, Niccolo Machiavelli's ideas on how political leaders should act isn't very admirable from my stance. Though we should have high expectations for political leaders, I disagree with his statements and think he is wrong. We should expect our political leaders to be virtuous as well as effective. I feel that we should be realistic when discussing politics like he states and that rulers should be filled with power and success, but those aren't the only two traits they should uphold. Contradictory to what Machiavelli thinks, I think both virtue and effectiveness are both important skills a leader needs to have, and I think that rulers should be more than just concerned with power and triumph.
<u>ANSWER </u><u>:</u>
Present evidence to support this reason and refute the counterclaim.
Hope it helps ya...!!♡
Direct evidence does not require any reasoning or inference to arrive at the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence.
Example: If a person testified that he or she looked outside a window and saw rain falling, that is direct evidence that it rained.
Indirect evidence, requires that an inference be made between the evidence and the conclusion to be drawn from it.
Example: If, on the other hand, a witness testified that he or she heard distant pitter patter, and later walked outside and saw that the ground was wet, smelled freshness in the air and felt that the air was moist, those sensations would be indirect evidence that it had rained.
About yourself and somethings that describe you
