The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was deemed unconstitutional because white settlers had revoked the constitution of the Cherokee nation in Georgia, stating that Native Americans were subject to Georgia's state laws, not their own.
The Cherokee nation argued that they were an independent, or sovereign nation, so they were not subject to the laws of the state of Georgia. The Supreme Court agreed, saying that Georgia had no authority over the Cherokee people, who were a sovereign nation. The Cherokee people could only be subject to the authority of the federal government, not state or local.
Even though the Indian Removal Act was deemed unconstitutional, President Jackson disagreed and continued the policy of relocating tribes, stating that they were voluntary. History has shown that, in fact, there were forced removals under this act.
easy way to help is to donate to affect is to destroy it it makes money go up because theres less
I think harbors cause of export
Explanation:
Why did India choose holding together federalism
Answer:
chiaroscuro
Explanation:
Renaissance Italians used the term chiaroscuro to describe light-dark gradations.
- chiaroscuro, (from Italian chiaro, “light,” and scuro, “dark”), is a technique employed in the visual arts to represent light and shadow as they define three-dimensional objects.
To learn more about chiaroscuro, refer
to brainly.com/question/25311149
#SPJ4
