1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kari74 [83]
3 years ago
13

What did it mean to say that the people’s natural rights are “inalienable”?

History
2 answers:
Ber [7]3 years ago
3 0
<span>C-The rights cannot be taken away from the people.
</span><span> 
It means they cannot be ''alienated'' or they are natural rights. Natural rights are those not contingent upon the laws, customs,or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable (i.e., rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws).</span>

exis [7]3 years ago
3 0
They can't take away those rights. like whatever rights they were there couldn't be anything done to take it away so they had to respect the rights and not do anything about it.
You might be interested in
why did the british give military aid to indian nations who were fighting americans in the northwest territory
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

The British were support the Indians in the northwest Indian wars. The Americans saw this as a British effort to end American sovereignty and this was a cause for the War of 1812.

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first line of the preamble begins with ...
Juliette [100K]

Answer:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Explanation:

It begins with the people the usa citzens.

_________________________

answered by aurinda;)

hope it helps:)

_________________________

6 0
4 years ago
Describe the primary difference between primary and secondary sources of historical evidence.
Maru [420]
A primary source is something that was write or made in the time period that it’s talking about. A secondary source is something the wasn’t created in the same time period as it’s talking about. Hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
How did the Supreme Court's decision in Scott v. Sandford affect the issue of slavery in the United
nalin [4]

Answer:

The answers are B and E.

6 0
3 years ago
What type of climate of Georgia have
Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

The climate of Georgia is a humid subtropical climate with most of the state having short, mild winters and long, hot summers.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the peloponnesian war differ from earlier conflicts in greece
    8·1 answer
  • Which list correctly orders events in the rise and fall of apartheid in south africa? i.nelson
    6·2 answers
  • Marks of the Gupta society included:
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement about Francisco Pizarro is true
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME
    9·1 answer
  • • The Mayflower Compact
    12·1 answer
  • Which years were considered the Nation's boom?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP - (ONLY HAVE A FEW MINUTES LEFT) - The Anglo settlers in Texas faced all of the following problems except:
    10·1 answer
  • 29. How did Morgan explain his finding?
    9·1 answer
  • Who was assassinated president Lincoln?short answer ​
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!