1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kari74 [83]
3 years ago
13

What did it mean to say that the people’s natural rights are “inalienable”?

History
2 answers:
Ber [7]3 years ago
3 0
<span>C-The rights cannot be taken away from the people.
</span><span> 
It means they cannot be ''alienated'' or they are natural rights. Natural rights are those not contingent upon the laws, customs,or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable (i.e., rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws).</span>

exis [7]3 years ago
3 0
They can't take away those rights. like whatever rights they were there couldn't be anything done to take it away so they had to respect the rights and not do anything about it.
You might be interested in
which statement accurately describes the impact of the French and Indian War on the British and the colonies
schepotkina [342]

The answer to your question is,

C.  the British gains land but lost a lot of money leading them to tax the colonies

-Mabel <3

8 0
3 years ago
How did social systems, economic, and political*<br> systems change? after westernization
anzhelika [568]

Answer: Westernization has also been beneficial in globalizing the economy and creating more efficient ways of producing goods and services. Another benefit is the modernization of medical practices, resulting in the extension of life expectancy.

Explanation: hope this helps if not let me know.

5 0
2 years ago
Which policy or initiative contributed most to the nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union
nika2105 [10]

The policy contributed most to the nuclear arms race was Mutual Assured Destruction


This means that both sides knew that any attack upon the other would be devastating to themselves, therefore restraining them from attacking the other. Each side possesses enough nuclear weapons to obliterate the other side that causes them to restrain from attacking afraid of the annihilation.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following does NOT describe the U.S. role in the Iran-Contra Affair?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer: The U.S. made sure that the American people knew about each step the U.S. government was taking during this time period with Iran and the hostages.

Explanation: the us did not tell the american people about the wepons sells

5 0
3 years ago
How did Democratic-Republicans react to the Alien and Sedition Acts? a. They supported the acts by voting for them in Congress.
elena55 [62]
"b. They opposed them by <span>charging that they were unconstitutional" is the best option since this group considered the acts to be a serious violation of their rights as citizens, even in times of war.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the 1400s Europe was made up of many independent states. The states often competed with each other for resources including im
    12·1 answer
  • Define Progressivism. Why was there a demand for it ?
    12·1 answer
  • During the Industrial Revolution, how did innovations in technology affect the use of slave labor in the United States?
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME
    12·1 answer
  • Legislators make laws in response to
    7·1 answer
  • 11. Which African Country Named its Capital After a U.S. President?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these is a statement of opinion?
    7·1 answer
  • Whom creates all courts other than the Supreme Court
    15·1 answer
  • Explain why Africa Nations lacked stability.
    6·2 answers
  • Hitler was voted in as chancellor of germany in 1933 under which political party:.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!