1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vodomira [7]
4 years ago
6

What belief is built on the first amendment's guarantees that the government will not choose an official religion or prevent cit

izens from practicing any religion they choose?
Social Studies
2 answers:
kvv77 [185]4 years ago
8 0
The separation of church and state - APEX
Zina [86]4 years ago
3 0
The belief is that <span>The separation of church and state.
Including certain religious organizations within the governmental process will indicate that the government would always work in favor of the specific religion This would be really contradictory to the first amendment that guarantee EQUAL treatment and freedom for ALL  religion.</span>
You might be interested in
1. How is the First Amendment a tool for the American people to keep control of their government?​
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

hey here for points good luck  :)

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The Dutch east India company did all of the following except
jeyben [28]

Answer:

d. helped spread Christianity to the East.

Explanation:

According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:

a. monopolized the spice trade.

c. made ties with local rulers.

b. opened trade with China.

d. helped spread Christianity to the East.

Out of these options, the only action that cannot be linked to the Dutch East India Company is that of spreading Christianity to the East. The Dutch East India Company was a corporation that dominated trade in the East during the 17th century. The company was responsible for making ties with the Mughal government, as well as other Southeast Asian governments, in order to control trade in the area. Its trade consisted mainly of spices (with a 21-year monopoly), silks, ships, coffee, sugarcane and wine.

4 0
3 years ago
Look at the chart called Population in Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois from 1800–1830 in Lesson 2. What are three questions you can
Zinaida [17]

Questions are to be framed according to the variance in the given data.

Explanation:

<u>Q1: Why there is no data available for Illinois?</u>

The answer is rather simple in that the state of Illinois did not exist in 1810

<u>Q2: What is the reason of rapid increase in the population in all the states.</u>

States like Ohio saw a massive population boom in the first few decades of the century, primarily due to expansion.

<u>Q3: How come all three states grew in population at a similar rate throughout?</u>

Very similar methods of expansion and population growth must be responsible for these numbers. The socio economic strata being similar also plays a role here.

3 0
4 years ago
One of the fundamental tenets of the ________ fallacy is that racial legacies such as slavery and colonialism do not structure o
MrRissso [65]

A fundamental tenet of the <u>ahistorical</u> fallacy states that racial legacies such as slavery and colonialism doesn't structure our experiences with race and racism today.

<h3>What is racism?</h3>

Racism can be defined as a belief that human race is a fundamental determinant of all human traits and capacities, which makes it possible for them to be divided into separate and exclusive biological entities.

According to fundamental tenet of the <u>ahistorical</u> fallacy, racial legacies such as slavery and colonialism doesn't structure our experiences with race and racism today.

In conclusion, slavery and colonialism doesn't structure all human experiences with race and racism today.

Read more on racism here: brainly.com/question/2864094

5 0
2 years ago
Develop a logical argument for the following question: If the Constitution were up for ratification today, who do you think woul
defon

Once the Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 at the Philadelphia convention, the next step was ratification.  This is the formal process, outlined in Article VII, which required that nine of the thirteen states had to agree to adopt the Constitution before it could go into effect.

As in any debate there were two sides, the Federalists who supported ratification and the Anti-Federalists who did not.

We now know that the Federalists prevailed, and the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, and went into effect in 1789.  Read about their arguments below.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A social psychologist would say that the story order of presenting evidence is most effective because it
    7·1 answer
  • How many voyages did Columbus make?
    11·2 answers
  • When approaching a curve to the right on a narrow road, you should drive in?
    6·1 answer
  • How did George Washington create a model for the American Presidency?
    12·1 answer
  • Posting personal information such as your birth date, family member names, and home address, does not increase your risk of iden
    11·1 answer
  • A four-year-old child is receiving prednisone. Which immunizations are safe for the child to receive? Select all that apply.?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the three branches of government.
    13·2 answers
  • Compared with participants listening to unstructured beat sequences, individuals listening to rhythmic drumming show enhanced __
    8·1 answer
  • This Black lord is called Musa Mali, Lord of the Black people of Mali. So abundant is the gold which is found in his country tha
    15·2 answers
  • What is A defensive stock
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!