I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
<h3>The Abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II</h3>
Wilhelm II abdicated from the throne as emperor of the 2nd Reich.
Sacramento. i hope i helped!
Answer:
During the 1920s, Congress supported domestic producers with a protective trade policy.
Explanation:
We can infer from the information in the question that during the 1920s, and even in 1930, Congress passed several laws that aimed at protecting American domestic producers from foreign competition.
These protectionist laws were the tariffs that are listed in the question. A tariff is simply a tax on foreign goods, and are the most commonly used protectionist policy.
