I don’t understand the question
We have taken risk management seriously since our early days as asset managers. Rather than seeing risk as something on the side or something on which we must focus for reasons of formality, we have long embedded risk management into our core investment process.
With the right risk framework in place, not only can portfolios experience better downside protection, but there can also be more potential for investors to see higher returns and diversify more optimally. In today's investment environment, it can be difficult to distinguish among markets and identify which risks are pertinent to your portfolios.
Selective optimization with compensation (SOC). If you don't find an answer on this site, use Google.
Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
When there is a positive externality the social benefit to consumers will be higher than the private benefit. Positive externalities mean that the benefit of production will be earned by some third party. The firms will not be compensated for these externalities. This will lead to market failure. So, a competitive firm will produce too few positive externalities unless the firms are compensated.
Given the above stated information, the the correction options is C. Three year loan costs less than 4 year loan.
<h3>What is a the calculations justifying the above answer?</h3>
The computation is executed using excel. Here is the explanation for same:
- There are two loan choices available. We must calculate the total payments for both alternatives and choose the one with the lowest cost.
- The first option is to pay $193.60 per month with 10% interest for 3 years.
- The second option is to pay $158 per month for four years at 12% interest.
- Total cost for option 1 is $969.60.
- Total cost for option 2 is $1584.00.
Hence from
Learn more about Loans:
brainly.com/question/26913200
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Please see the attached image
