Answer:
Both regions were influenced by international ethnic movements
Explanation:
In both regions, there were influences of multinational movements. The seek of affirming its cultural identity.
In the Balkans, there were still reflections of the Pan Slavism, a movement from the mid-XIX century which found fertile soil in Serbia. The Pan Slavism used to claim an international union of Slavic people under the leadership of Russia.
In the Middle East, there was some influence of pan Arabism on politics that Palestinian organizations and partisans, being united under the leadership of Egypt, and all other Arab-Islamic nations.
Even though both movements failed, they influenced politicians, people, partisans from both regions in conflict.
Answer:
California
Explanation:
i hope this helps i really don't understand what you are asking
Answer: Economy
Explanation:
Much like in politics, war is usually decided by money. Who has enough money to finance the war campaign such that their soldiers can get the best equipment and means to keep up the war effort.
The North had that advantage over the South and other advantages flowed from this. With a superior economy which was based on industry and finance, the North could levy taxes and collect more money from their people than the South could.
With this money they were able to buy better guns, better equip their navy, supply food to their soldiers and transport them around on railroads as well. The economy of the North made it such that they had a resource advantage over the South and they used this to their advantage from the mid to the late stages of the war.
The idea that peaceful mind could solve all problems in life helped spread Buddhism. It was especially popular in Eastern Asia because there were no dominant regions at the time and it originated in Asia.
The league of nations (which i assume you're talking about) was formed on <span>June 28, 1919.</span>
