1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kondaur [170]
3 years ago
5

While roughly the same nations were involved, the reasons why were different world war i and world war 2?

History
1 answer:
zaharov [31]3 years ago
7 0
Alliances in ww1 were different from ww2 because the entente in ww1 made up of serbia,russia,france,britan,japan and italy later america and all allied in a sort of balance of power and too keep germany,austria-hungary,and the ottomans down. Russia allied the serbians in order to exert its influence in the balkans while france allied the russians because france was still in dismay and insulted after the defeat to the germans during the unification of germany and britian allied the belgians after the germans invasion of belgium.In ww2 the alliances were in a preemptive attempt to deter any further wars into happening while germany and italy allied since they were insulted and humiliated after the previous war while also sharing a similar ideology of facsim along with japan which all 3 had a want for world domination and agreed to assist one another in the endevours 
You might be interested in
How did the development of new technology after World War I affect farmers
Xelga [282]
#2 is the correct answer

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is not a true statement about the Qin dynasty?
laila [671]
I think it is d but is definitely not b or c
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Maquilapolis Documentary Questions
o-na [289]
I don’t really know
8 0
3 years ago
What was the name given to low cost,multifaceted dwellings in the cities in the late 1800s?
tester [92]
Tenement I think that's the answer
4 0
3 years ago
Why the three colonial regions ( New England,middle, and south developed differently?
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

How were New England middle and southern colonies different?

The Middle colonies had some slaves while the New England colonies had very few slaves. This is true because there was more large scale farming in the southern part of the Middle colonies where the soil was more fertile and the climate more suited for farming. Thus, another difference is the kind of farming done.

Explanation:

use own words

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the first manned mission to reach Mars?
    10·1 answer
  • What drink did the passengers on the mayflower drink
    13·2 answers
  • George Washington believed that Bibles were of value for his men.<br><br> True <br> False
    15·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from a declaration passed by the United Nations General Assembly in 1960. 3. Inadequacy of political, economic,
    5·2 answers
  • The First Continental Congress decided to do which of the following?
    13·2 answers
  • The case of Anna is an example of which of the following? A. Game stage B. Extreme isolation C. Normal socialization D. A twin s
    9·1 answer
  • What were the total number of deaths
    9·1 answer
  • After the Civil War radical Republicans believed that the Southern states were "conquered provinces" that had completely left th
    14·1 answer
  • The Emancipation Proclamation, by its very existence, transformed the conflict over preserving the Union into a war of liberatio
    12·1 answer
  • What are the two main regions of origin of migrants settling in the United States? How do you explain it?​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!