I'm not entirely sure and this response is late but I'm pretty sure it's when the central vacuoles lose their water and can no longer support the cell. When the vacuole of a cell is full it pushes outward against the cell wall. When it has nothing in it, you can assume that because the vacuole is so big and is such a big component of this that this would be the answer.
The best approach for Tyler is a controlled experiment if he wants to directly observe the outcome.
A controlled experiment is designed to minimize the effects of the variables other than the independent variable. A controlled experiment allows reliable results because he can do the experiment specific to the problem and variables involved.
No because the cell is already dead and it could not survive.
The answer would be survival of the fittest.
This metaphor, "<em>survival of the fittest</em>," was used by Herbert Spencer to explain <em>natural selection. </em>It is sometimes also referred to as the survival for existence. This phrase came from the Dawinian theory of evolution where he explains that all species are capable of producing many offsprings. However, the survival of those offsprings depends on their ability to adapt to the risks and opportunities of the external environment.
<em>
</em>This relates to your scenario in the sense that fish lay a lot of eggs in the beginning but not all of them would live to achieve maturity. This is because even as eggs, they have many predators and are exposed to other elements. The threat pushes on even if they are able to hatch and grow up.
<em>
</em>
