Think of a policy as a plan. We will do B if A happens. The best example I can think of is the policy that the United States does not negotiate with terrorists. That is a policy, but it has been broken, for example, when POW were traded from Guantanimo Bay for US soldiers taken hostage.
<span>A law is legally binding. For example, the President of the United States can veto bills. That isn't a policy. The President doesn't have a guideline that he can veto bills and Congress can't say we will break that "policy" this time. That is the law so they must allow it. </span>
<span>In short, </span>policies<span> are </span>not<span> legally binding. They are "plans". </span>
<span>Laws </span><span>are </span><span>legally binding. They are final and concrete, for the purposes of this discussion.</span>
Answer:
actually yes
Explanation:
in the old ages the Jews basically ruled Jerusalem (hence the name) and people hated them for the way they treated the people there, not their religion. When Hitler came to power many years later after they had lost the rule of Jerusalem people started hating them for the way they horded money and their religion. Now people just hate them for their religion.
So yes antisemitism has changed over time.
The Causes of the Spanish Civil War. ... Between 1936 and 1939 over 500,000 people were killed in the Spanish Civil War so this cannot be considered a 'little' war that was overshadowed by the problems that were occurring in Europe during these years. In 1920, Spain was a constitutional monarchy. The king was Alfonso XIII.
The primary tool used by the federal reserve in response to economic booms and recessions is buying and selling bonds in open markets operations.