Answer: enables marketers to tailor marketing mixes to meet the needs of particular population segments
Explanation:
Market segmentation enables marketers to tailor marketing mixes to meet the needs of particular population segments. Segmentation helps marketers identify consumer needs and preferences, areas of declining demand, and new marketing opportunities. the marketing strategy of almost all successful organizations.
Answer:
a. Yes. It is a probability density function because \sum f(x) =1
. b. probability MCC will obtain more than 30 new clients=P(40)+P(50)+P(60)= 0.20+0.35+0.20=0.75
c. probability MCC will obtain fewer than 20 new clients= P(10)= 0.05
d.
x f(x) x*f(x) x*x*f(x)
10 0.05 0.5 5
20 0.1 2 40
30 0.1 3 90
40 0.2 8 320
50 0.35 17.5 875
60 0.2 12 720
1 43 2050
expected value = \sum xf(x) = 43
Variance = 2050-43^2= 201
Explanation:
Answer:
The after-tax cost is $23,940
Explanation:
For computing the after-tax cost, first we have to compute the present value which is shown below:
Present value = Bill payment × marginal tax rate
= $38,000 × 37%
= $14,060
So, after tax value would equal to
= Bill payment or Pre tax value - Present value
= $38,000 - $14,060
= $23,940
Answer
Food is what we get from agriculture.
To rank the given option from the highest to lowest degree of importance, we need to do a little research on the each of the individual subjects.
these can be arranged in the following order.
(1) Food
(2) agriculture
(3) natural resources careers.
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
