Interpretive claims is not necessary in a historical essay.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
A historical essay is defined as an essay illustrating assertions about historic events that are substantiated by adequate evidence to give the viewers a greater clarity and knowledge of that specific event.
Interpretive claims are points of view which are explored and evaluated in an essay. Although interpretive claims could be well-versed and advocated by historical record, it is regarded subjective since the writer uses it to voice their opinion. They are not essential for a historical essay because those claims represent the writer's opinion or perception of an event or topic that is not far mandated in a historical essay.
I am pretty sure its <span>the western edge of Pennsylvania, where the border was undefined.
</span>
C. Conquered most of the civilized world between India and Greece. is your answer.
Alexander the Great was a Macedonian Prince that was able to unify most of Eastern Europe, Greece, all the way to Asia, under his rule. However, at his death, the empire soon split apart between his generals, and was non-existent.
~
Answer:
Explanation:
Bullmoose Party.
I do hope I helped you! :)
