In several small faming villages in which they harvested and grew their owns crops,clothing etc for their own use. Many people didn't really travel from their villages because of bad roads. <span>Industrialisation from the Industrial Revolution brought with it new types of roads, trains and </span>many<span> other forms of communications which simply </span>did<span> not exist </span><span>prior to the revolution. </span>
The correct cases and their results between Brown v. Board of Education and Plessy v. Ferguson were:
Brown v. Board of Education:
- Said segregation was NOT ALLOWED.
- This case OVERTURNED the precedent.
Plessy v. Ferguson:
- Coined the term "Separate but equal"
- Said that segregation (separation based on skin color) was ALLOWED.
<h3>How were Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education different?</h3>
Plessy v. Ferguson was a case in the U.S. Supreme Court which affirmed that segregation based on skin color was allowed so long as both races were still treated equally.
Board of Education overturned the precedent and said that segregation by its very nature was not equal and so could not be allowed.
Find out more on Board of Education at brainly.com/question/15225232.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Faster end to the war ore land involved so the opportunity to win more Cons: incredibal loss of life on both sides expensive to repair all that damagge and levaves you weak
Explanation:hope this helps god bless
<u>Answer:</u> Hobbes believed people exchange their <u>personal liberty</u> for protection and security under a government.
<u>Explanation/detail:</u>
Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.
Probably the most famous set of lines from Hobbes' <em>Leviathan </em>book describes what he saw as the natural state of human affairs without government -- one in which every individual had freedom, but that meant it was a situation of "war of all against all," or we might say, every man for himself. Hobbes wrote:
- <em>In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is </em><em>worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.</em>
I believe Robespierre started to lose power when he was arrested alongside the Jacobins. He ended up dying by the guillotine. This was also the end of the Reign of Terror. Brainliest…….. maaaaybe……